Edit 1
I made the test with real palatino font and Neo-Euler, with the same result (As far as I can see)
\documentclass{standalone}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont[] {PalatinoLTStd-Roman.otf}
%\setmathrm [] {}
\usepackage{unicode-math}
\setmathfont[math-style=upright]{euler.otf}
\usepackage{siunitx}
\begin{document}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
Text & MV/m \\
equation & $MV/m$\\
two mathrm & $\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m}$\\
one mathrm & $\mathrm{MV/m}$\\
siunitx & \si[per-mode = symbol]{\mega\volt\per\metre}
\end{tabular}
\end{document}
Original
I am using palatino with euler as shown below.
I noticed a big space between V
and /
. I am not sure if it is because the slash is a binary operator or because the kerning is incorrect.
I have this problem with the unit and it shown also with siunitx
.
Do you also think it is too much space?
\documentclass{standalone}
\renewcommand{\rmdefault}{ppl} % rm
\linespread{1.05} % Palatino needs more leading
\usepackage[scaled]{helvet} % ss
\usepackage{courier} % tt
\usepackage{eulervm} % a better implementation of the euler package (not in gwTeX)
\normalfont
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
%\usepackage{verbatim}
\usepackage{siunitx}
\begin{document}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
Text & MV/m \\
equation & $MV/m$\\
two mathrm & $\mathrm{MV}/\mathrm{m}$\\
one mathrm & $\mathrm{MV/m}$\\
siunitx & \si[per-mode = symbol]{\mega\volt\per\metre}
\end{tabular}
\end{document}
ppl
now).