21

I know this question has been already discussed but the answer does not seem to work in my case.

I am using the \atop command with the amsmath package to stack two symbols (more specifically $a=x$ and $b=y$) but, as well known, this is foreign to LaTeX.

The standard reply I found (and LaTeX warning suggestion) is to use \frac or \genfrac, but these will insert a line between the two symbols, that I do not want. The other suggestion is to use \overset, but this treats the symbol below as main and prints it bigger than the one above.

How do I obtain the same result as \atop without getting the LaTeX warning?

  • 1
    See the stackengine and/or the tabstackengine package. – Steven B. Segletes Sep 14 '18 at 10:21
32

\genfrac won't produce a line if the third argument (which control the thickness of the rule) is set to 0pt; the syntax for \genfrac is

\genfrac{<left-delim>}{<right-delim>}{<thickness>}{<mathstyle>}{<numerator>}{<denominator>}

A little example:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}

\newcommand\mycom[2]{\genfrac{}{}{0pt}{}{#1}{#2}}

\begin{document}
$A\mycom{a=x}{b=y}B$
\end{document}

enter image description here

  • 1
    @GonzaloMedina sorry, I hadn't looked back at this. Your answer is more complete. It's all yours. – A.Ellett Jun 14 '13 at 5:07
8

The question does not tell the context, where the symbol stacking is used.

  • \genfrac is shown in the other answer(s). It also uses the next smaller math style if available.

  • \substack can be used in limits, because it does not change the math style:

Example using \substack:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}

\begin{document}
\[
   \sum_{a=x \atop b=y}^{\text{atop}}
   \quad
   \sum_{\substack{a=x\\b=y}}^{\text{substack}}
   \quad
   \sum_{a=x}^{\text{normal}}
\]
\end{document}

Result

0

You can use \underset see the following example

\begin{equation}
\prod\limits_{\underset{j\ne h}{j = 1}}^{4K} {\Gamma \left( {{a_h} - {a_j}} \right)} 
\end{equation}
  • Welcome to TeX.SE. A quick hint: If you indent lines of code by four spaces, the site software will pretty-print them automatically. Separately, I think you should mention in your answer that \underset requires loading of the amsmath package and (even more importantly) that the second argument will be typeset in a smaller font than the first. This behavior is quite different from that of \substack, which does not impose a font size change from the one row to the next. – Mico Sep 14 '18 at 10:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.