Calling fancy page style is somehow apparently causing the following condition to test true.

\ifcsname chapter\endcsname%

If I place \pagestyle{fancy} after the conditional, \ifcsname chapter....\fi, everything works. This is an article class, so this conditional should be false. If I call \pagestyle{plain}, it doesn't matter where I place it.

Why does this order matter?


The page style fancy (\ps@fancy) contains:


That is the LaTeX test for undefined:


\csname has the side effect that it defines an undefined command with the meaning \relax:

\pagestyle{fancy}% \@ifundefined{chapter}{...}{...}

The meaning of \chapter changes:

> \chapter=undefined.
l.3 \show\chapter

> \chapter=\relax.
l.5 \show\chapter

Now \chapter is defined for e-TeX's \ifcsname and \renewcommand{\chapter}{} is called that again used the LaTeX idea of undefined: A command is undefined if it is undefined or has the meaning of \relax. As result \renewcommand complains that `\chapter is not defined.

e-TeX's \ifcsname does not have the side effect and lets the command untouchted. (Also it is internally optimized in the sense that it does not create a hash table entry.)

The test needs to be a little longer:

\ifcsname chapter\endcsname

A defined \chapter might confuse packages and macros about the capabilities of the class (article does not have chapters). If the purpose of the mysterious \renewcommand\chapter{} is to undefine chapter, then it will fail, because \chapter remains defined with the meaning of an empty macro. A command can be undefined by assigning it to an undefined macro:

\ifcsname chapter\endcsname
  • So, I gather \ifcsname does not have this side-effect? I ask because I'd already used \ifcsname chapter\endcsname at least once earlier in my original file. But there was never a complaint when compiling. – A.Ellett Jun 20 '13 at 6:47
  • Actually, \renewcommand\chapter{} was just for the MWE. In the actual document I'm doing something more along the lines of what @egreg was suggesting regarding tex.stackexchange.com/a/111641/22413 an earlier question of mine). I would like my package to be versatile enough to define things correctly whether the class is article, book, etc. – A.Ellett Jun 20 '13 at 6:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.