3

I have the following problems:

  1. in the first reaction scheme the arrow is too high and I would like to bring it a little down.

  2. in the second reaction scheme the third chemical structure (after the arrow) is a little bit low and I would like to bring it up.

  3. in the third structure I would like to connect A to C not to B.

Thanks a lot.

\documentclass[12pt,doublespacing,letterpaper]{report}

\usepackage{chemfig}

\begin{document}

\setatomsep{2em}
\setbondoffset{1pt}
\setdoublesep{3pt}
\setbondstyle{line width=1pt}

\schemestart[0,1.2,thick]
\chemfig{R_3B}
\+
\chemfig{CH_2=CH-C(=[:90]O)-CH_3}
\arrow{%
->[\footnotesize H$_2$O]%
  []%
 }[,2,thick]
 \chemfig{R-CH_2-CH-C(=[:90]O)-CH_3}
\schemestop

\bigskip

\schemestart[0,2,thick]
  \scriptsize\chemfig{[:-30]*6(-=-(-[,1.2]BF_3K)=-=)}
  \arrow{0}[,0]\+{1em,1em ,17pt}
  \scriptsize\chemfig{HO-[:75,,2](-[:115])(-[:150])-(-[:65]OH)(-[:-45])-[:-90]}
 \arrow{%
 ->[\footnotesize SiO$_2$]%
  [\footnotesize H$_2$O]%
  }
  \scriptsize\chemfig{*6(-=-(-[,1.1]B?-[:60,1.1]O-[:10](-[:60])(-[:20])-[:-60](-[:45])(-[:-5])-[:-145]O-[:-195]?)=-=-)}
\schemestop

\bigskip

\scriptsize\chemfig{*6(-=-(-A(-[:90]B*5(-C-*6(-=-=-)=-D=))-[:-30,1.2]OEt)=-=)}

\end{document}

reaction scheme

  • the code does not compile without errors – clemens Jul 6 '13 at 17:10
  • @cgnieder You are right. Sorry about that. I just fixed that. – chemist Jul 6 '13 at 17:18
  • @cgnieder Thanks a lot! As usual, I really appreciate your help! – chemist Jul 6 '13 at 17:33
2

For the alignment issues: you can use anchors as described in section 5 Anchoring of part IV Reaction Schemes in the chemfig manual. Basically this is done using the following syntax:

\arrow(.<anchor>--.<anchor>)

where <anchor> is either the name of the TikZ anchor or the value of a angle. The code below uses

\arrow(.mid east--.mid west)

for the first scheme and

\arrow(--.-162.5)

for the second. You can find details on anchoring both in the chemfig manual and of course in the pgfmanual.

As for the “issue” with the connection of atoms: just draw it the way you want it. Stupid as this sounds it is exactly what I changed in your molecule. The important part is

B*5(-C-*6(-=-=-)=-D=)

“Rotating” the ring by one bond you get what you need:

C*5(-*6(-=-=-)=-D=B-)

The code below also fixes the erroneous redefinition of \printatom and moves it and the other global settings into the preamble (where they belong, IMHO). I also added indentation to make the code more readable.

enter image description here

\documentclass[12pt,doublespacing,letterpaper]{report}

\usepackage{chemfig}

\setatomsep{2em}
\setbondoffset{1pt}
\setdoublesep{3pt}
\setbondstyle{line width=1pt}

\renewcommand\printatom[1]{%
  \fontsize{11pt}{11pt}\selectfont
  \ensuremath{\mathrm{#1}}%
}

\begin{document}

\schemestart[0,1.2,thick]
  \chemfig{R_3B}
  \+
  \chemfig{CH_2=CH-C(=[:90]O)-CH_3}
  \arrow(.mid east--.mid west){%
    ->[\footnotesize H$_2$O]%
  }[,2,thick]
  \chemfig{R-CH_2-CH-C(=[:90]O)-CH_3}
\schemestop

\bigskip


\schemestart[0,2,thick]
  \scriptsize
  \chemfig{[:-30]*6(-=-(-[,1.2]BF_3K)=-=)}
  \arrow{0}[,0]\+{1em,1em ,17pt}
  \scriptsize
  \chemfig{HO-[:75,,2](-[:115])(-[:150])-(-[:65]OH)(-[:-45])-[:-90]}
  \arrow(--.-162.5){%
    ->[\footnotesize SiO$_2$]%
      [\footnotesize H$_2$O]%
  }
  \scriptsize
  \chemfig{
    *6(-=-(
      -[,1.1]B?-[:60,1.1]O-[:10](-[:60])(-[:20])
      -[:-60](-[:45])(-[:-5])
      -[:-145]O-[:-195]?
    )=-=-)
  }
\schemestop


\bigskip

\scriptsize
\chemfig{
  *6(-=-(
    -A(-[:90]C*5(-*6(-=-=-)=-D=B-))
    -[:-30,1.2]OEt)
  =-=)
}

\end{document}

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.