When using Biblatex's autocite command, I sometimes come across instances when I need to format the citations as a reference set. There is the option of using mcite, but then I lose the high level markup that autocite offers, .e.g. switching between plain, inline and superscript. If I use autocite or autocites, each reference would get it's own citation in the bibliography. Is there a solution that offers something like what I call \mautocite in this example?

Some text here\autocite{key1}. More text here\mautocite{set1,*key2,*key3,*key4}. 

Cite a subentry\autocite{key3}.


In the text, it would appear as

Some text here [1]. More text here [2].

Cite a subentry [2b].

And this would give two entries in the bibliography, where the second reference, [2], would be a set. Is there a way to get biblatex to do this?

2 Answers 2


The mcite-like commands are defined in the biblatex module blx-mcite.def. There you will find a citation command modifier \mcitelike, used as follows.

\newrobustcmd*{<new mcite command>}{\mcitelike<existing citation command>}

An mcite-like \autocite is somewhat odd because \autocite is intended to be style-independent, but mcite-like commands are relevant only to numeric citation styles. That said you can define an mcite-variant of \autocite with:


Here's an example.


% just for demo

% define mcite-like variant of \autocite

\mtextcite{companion,bertram,knuth,*knuth:ct:a,*knuth:ct:b} showed that...
Filler text \autocite{knuth:ct:a}.
Filler text \mautocite{model,*weinberg,*glashow}. 
Filler text \autocite{weinberg}.

enter image description here

Note that here \mtextcite{companion,bertram,knuth,*knuth:ct:a,*knuth:ct:b} is the equivalent of:


Similarly \mautocite{model,*weinberg,*glashow} becomes:


Futher details can be found in the biblatex manual sections "mcite-like Citation Commands" and "Dynamic Entry Sets". Various label number and entry set bugs were introduced/fixed between versions 1.1 and 2.7, so you should upgrade to the latest biblatex and biber releases to get all relevant features working properly.

  • Cheers! This is the solution I was looking for!
    – Samuel Tan
    Jul 29, 2013 at 1:01
  • @SamuelTan My initial post uncovered a bug, which I documented here. The fix will be in the next release, but it is pretty easy to apply yourself.
    – Audrey
    Jul 29, 2013 at 1:47

For this kind biblatex provides the set entry:


In your example this would then follow like this:

Some text here\autocite{key1}. More text here\autocite{a-set}. 

Cite a subentry\autocite{key3}.

  • 2
    mcite-like commands are for defining dynamic (on-the-fly) entry sets. Sets defined with @set are static. This is still relevant information, though, so +1.
    – Audrey
    Jul 27, 2013 at 18:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.