I do not know if this question has more to do with the editor I use (which is LaTeXShop, on Mac) or some clever LaTeX package, but I am typesetting some notes for a course and I would like to systematically use a command, say


for the variable of functions so that I can write


and get $f(x)$ or $f(Y)$ consistently in the whole document by simply choosing once and for all in the preamble the value of \variable. The reason is that in a first version $f(x)$ might be good, but I think I will eventually want to move to different variable names. The problem is that I have been typing $f(x)$ automatically for ages now, and I fear that here and there I will write $f(x)$ instead of $f(\variable)$ getting the same visual effect if \variable is set to $x$, so that I will never catch the error while proof reading, but creating a mess the day I will rename my \variable. So comes my question: is there a systematic way to ask LaTeX to warn me whenever I use $x$ "although I wanted to use \variable"? Of course, I do not want it to warn me each time I use the letter x. (I will be writing in French, and there are a lot of x's here and there in text) nor to warn me about $f(x)$ and forget about $g(x)$.)


1 Answer 1


You can make x math active:


%%% The following four lines will make all
%%% explicit `x' in math mode being printed red
\edef\variable{\mathchar\the\mathcode`\x\relax} % this indirectly defines \variable to print an x
\AtBeginDocument{\mathcode`x=\string"8000 }

%%% When you're through, remove the lines
%%% above and use the following one


This is good: $f(\variable)$

This is bad: $f(x)\ne g(x)$.


enter image description here

  • Great, thank you! This is exactly what I was looking for. It would be very kind if you could also explain what is going on: in particular, I do not understand where in your code you told LaTeX that $\variable$ corresponds to x, because it is commented in the version I see. Aug 19, 2013 at 9:26
  • I tried your code and it is working, although it gives me a bizarre error when I write $x$ as subscript (which is not a big issue, since the point was precisely to remove all these $x$; but can still be annoying if, for any reason, I want to use the $x$-symbol elsewhere...). Any clue? Aug 20, 2013 at 7:02
  • 1
    @FilippoAlbertoEdoardo With the code I presented, $a_x$ will indeed give an error, which is not raised when the “more correct” syntax $a_{x}$ is used. I'll change the code to allow using $a_x$.
    – egreg
    Aug 20, 2013 at 8:38
  • thanks! But I can also adapt to $a_{x}$, indeed... Aug 20, 2013 at 10:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .