121

What I have are two equations with align and I want one single equation number to refer to this system of equations. To illustrate, I have

\begin{align}
  dr_t &= \kappa ( \theta - r_t ) dt + \sigma_r r^{\xi} dW_t \\
  dA_t &= \mu A_t dt + \sigma_A^{\alpha} dZ_t,
\end{align}

1 and I want neither

\begin{align}
  dr_t &= \kappa ( \theta - r_t ) dt + \sigma_r r^{\xi} dW_t \nonumber \\
  dA_t &= \mu A_t dt + \sigma_A^{\alpha} dZ_t,
\end{align}

enter image description here nor

\begin{align}
  dr_t &= \kappa ( \theta - r_t ) dt + \sigma_r r^{\xi} dW_t \\
  dA_t &= \mu A_t dt + \sigma_A^{\alpha} dZ_t, \nonumber
\end{align}

enter image description here

but having a single number in the middle. I know this can be achieved by nesting an array inside of an equation but then some symbols (sums, etc.) look differently and I thought there had to be a better way of doing this.

137

Use aligned instead.

\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
  dr_t &= \kappa ( \theta - r_t ) dt + \sigma_r r^{\xi} dW_t \\
  dA_t &= \mu A_t dt + \sigma_A^{\alpha} dZ_t, 
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}

enter image description here

  • @Paul: That seems wrong. Hmm. – TH. Mar 14 '11 at 15:11
  • 1
    @Martin: I think it was rejected because most of the TeX code here is designed to display as TeX, not as graphics. – TH. Mar 14 '11 at 17:34
  • 2
    also with the complicated LaTeX constructions sometimes shown here, it may be difficualt to secure a LaTeX to image renderer. Depending on the system it might e.g. be easy to fill a disk/partition or make LaTeX run in an infinite loop. Thus I thinkthe current situation is the best compromise. – daleif Mar 22 '11 at 23:05
  • 1
    @TH.: I have a comment on your answer which is too big to give as a comment, so I've put it as a separate (noncompeting) answer. – Ryan Reich May 5 '11 at 15:05
  • 1
    Environments equation and align serve similar kinds of purposes. Whereas the purpose of split or alignedis quite distinct: i.e. they typically fit inside equation, align*, etc. – Evgeni Sergeev Jul 12 '17 at 5:14
44

Here's a slightly better way to do this (IMO):

Using the split environment within an align will produce one equation number, vertically centered within the split (so long as there's not a page break involved, as discussed here).

Note that you can have individual labels for each equation by adding \label{} to the end of each line before the line break \\

For example:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}

\begin{document} 

\begin{align}
  E_1&=A+B \label{eq:1}\\
   \begin{split}
    E_2&=(C-D)E_1 \label{eq:2}\\
    &\quad +[(1-R)+R(1-Y)\\
    &\quad +\pi(1-\delta)]E_2\\
    &\quad +F\cdot E_3
   \end{split}\\
  E_3 &=(\pi\cdot \chi)-(R\cdot E_1)-(RY\delta\cdot E_2) \label{eq:3}
\end{align}

\end{document}

which gives:

enter image description here

39

This is really a comment on TH.'s accepted answer (which should stay that way). Using just one aligned doesn't work if you have multiple columns: they are separated by only a small space, since aligned "shrinks to fit". The workaround is to use one aligned per column, and wrap the whole thing in a larger align, like so:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
 \begin{align}
  \begin{aligned}
   x &= y \\       f(x) &= f(y)
  \end{aligned}
  &&
  \begin{aligned}
   a &= b \\       g(a) &= g(b)
  \end{aligned}
 \end{align}
\end{document}

This should produce two pairs of equations, each aligned at the equals sign, and with one equation number centered between the lines.

enter image description here

2

Using

\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
  dr_t &= \kappa ( \theta - r_t ) dt + \sigma_r r^{\xi} dW_t \\
  dA_t &= \mu A_t dt + \sigma_A^{\alpha} dZ_t,
\end{split}
\end{equation}

will produce one equation number that is vertically centered on the group of equations.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.