9

Ho can I declare a math operator which will appear in bold font?

I tried the following, but it didn't work:

\DeclareMathOperator{\Div}{Div}
\newcommand{\Divxk}{\mathbf{\Div}_{X/k}}
Improve this question
12

The \mathbf around \Div does nothing, because \Div is translated internally to something like "choose the \mathrm font and typeset ‘Div’”. Math fonts don't inherit features from the context: \mathrm always corresponds to the upright text font in medium weight (or boldface) if \boldmath is in force.

You can check that

$\mathbf{\mathrm{x}}$

produces a medium weight ‘x’.

So you have to define

\DeclareMathOperator{\Div}{\mathbf{Div}}
\newcommand{\Divxk}{\Div_{X/k}}

The definition of \Div becomes “choose the \mathrm font and typeset ‘\mathbf{Div}’”, so, for the same reason as before, the boldface font will be chosen.

Improve this answer
8

Try this:

\DeclareMathOperator{\Div}{\mathbf{Div}}
Improve this answer
1
  • That works, so you could define \DivB as a bold version of \Div for use as required, but that may not necessarily meet the OP's use case. The general question of why \mathbf{\SomeMathOperator} doesn't have the desired effect (and what to do about it) may be more interesting. – Chris H Sep 24 '13 at 14:10
4

An alternative approach is to use \boldsymbol:

Sample output

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{amsmath}
\DeclareMathOperator{\Div}{Div}
\newcommand{\Divxk}{\mathop{\boldsymbol{\Div}}_{X/k}}

\begin{document}
\( \Div \)

\( \Divxk \)
\end{document}
Improve this answer
2
  • The spacing is wrong; try $a\Divxk b$, where the operator nature is lost. It should be \mathop{\mathbf{Div}}_{X/k}. – egreg Sep 24 '13 at 14:55
  • @egreg Of course! Thanks for pointing that out. Answer updated. – Andrew Swann Sep 24 '13 at 15:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.