I am using the cleveref package to refer to theorems, equations, etc, in an article (LaTeX). I wish to have the format of reference as: Thm. (1) for single theorem (or equation, figure, etc) and Thms. (1,2) for a pair of (theorem) labels.

To achieve my required format with cleveref I do:

\newcommand{\crefpairconjunction}{ ,~}

However, I am not quite able to achieve the format required for the case where I have a pair of labels -- I require the counters in the reference to be enclosed by "(" and ")" parenthesis:

Thms. (1.1, 1.2)

Can anyone please help me modify the format for multiple labels case ? Since some had asked for a MWE, here is one:




\newcommand{\crefpairconjunction}{ ,~}




Here is a sample theorem:
\begin{theorem} \label{thm-something}
Define something \dots

Here is another sample theorem:
\begin{theorem} \label{thm-some-other-thing}
Define some other thing \dots

I do not want references in this format: \cref{thm-something,thm-some-other-thing}

I want to enclose the counters by ``('' and ``)'' parenthesis. So it should be: ``Thms. (1.1, 1.2)''.

I have edited this question based on comments on its previous posting. (This question is a continuation of How to cross-reference several objects simultaneously )

  • can you give us a complete minimal working example (MWE) to play with?
    – cmhughes
    Oct 6, 2013 at 4:58
  • You say you want something like Eqs. (1,2,3) to be the result of cross-referencing the first three equations. What should be the result when cross-referencing equations 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12: Should it be Eqs. (7--12) or Eqs. (7,8,9,10,11,12)? Please advise.
    – Mico
    Oct 6, 2013 at 11:42

1 Answer 1


The command \crefformat is meant for defining the formats of cross-references to single instances of an equation, a figure, a theorem, etc. To set up the formatting for a cross-reference to a range of items, you need to work with \crefrangeformat. The following setup may suit your needs:


Be sure to use the command \crefrange{<first-label>}{<last-label>} when referring to ranges of labels.

By the way, you seem to have a lot of pairs of curly braces , {}, in your \crefformat instructions. These pairs probably aren't necessary.

  • This works, but still leaves the case with multiple labels that are not in range. For e.g. \cref{eq1, eq4}
    – kksagar
    Feb 4 at 12:50
  • @kksagar - Well, I'm sure relieved that you believe that my answer "works." My answer addressed the questions raised in the original query. I do not feel the slightest bit of embarrassment, let alone shame or inadequacy, for not having answered a question that was not asked to begin with. If you have a question about something that's not contained in the query above, please feel free to post a new query.
    – Mico
    Feb 4 at 12:54
  • My comment wasn't meant to embarrass or shame you in any way. I am sorry if you thought so
    – kksagar
    Feb 4 at 14:12
  • @kksagar - So maybe my choice of words was a bit [!] over the top. My point stands: I'm not bothered by somebody pointing out that I didn't address a question that wasn't asked to begin with.
    – Mico
    Feb 4 at 18:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.