While I'm aware that hyperref doesn't suport footnotes and I quote:
hyperfootnotes boolean true
Makes the footnote marks into hyperlinks to the footnote text. Easily broken …
I'm wondering if anyone's found a workaround for something like:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[stable,perpage,multiple,bottom]{footmisc}
\usepackage[hyperfootnotes=true]{hyperref}
\usepackage{footnotebackref} % connect note back to table
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{blindtext}
\begin{document}
\blindtext
\newpage
\blindtext
\begin{longtable}{c c p{3cm} c}
& centered \footnote{Here's a note from a
centered column} & \\
& & paragraph \footnote{This note is } & \\
\end{longtable}
\end{document}
Which gives
Here we can see that the note from a centered column works as expected (i.e. clicking on the footnote label brings the user to the footnote' they can then click on this label and be brought back to the table) while that from a paragraph-formatted column is rather recalcitrant (it brings the user back to the top of the document). I'm using footnotebackref to get back to the table, but this behavior is not essential...
(I'm using the \usepackage{}
s as above after numerous attempts to solve this - this seems to be the closest I can come).
I'm asking as I have a table spanning multiple pages which would be better if a paragraph-formatted column could hyperlink to a footnote on the same page.
Or is this currently not possible?
! Undefined control sequence.<argument> \BackrefFootnoteTag
you (or someone:-) should fix that before looking at the output. You don't say what is wrong with the output you show but I assume it is just the missing backlink on the second footnote, which is I assume related.\BackrefFootnoteTag
error is due to the second footnote not being properly defined and having no tag, so thatfootnotebackref
can't find it. It can be removed by commenting out\usepackage{footnotebackref}
footnotebackref
but then everything works and there is no issue, it is only that the backref doesn't work on the second footnot isn't it? If there are no footnote backrefs everythuing is as expected.