I am not sure this is the right place to post questions about asymptote, but if not I can delete it later.

Here is the code I am playing with:


pair A=(0,0);
pair B=(3,0);
pair C=(2,1);
pair D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K;

F = rotate(90, A)*C;
G = C + F;
I = rotate(-90, B)*C;
H = (C-B) + I;
J = rotate(90, G)*H;
/*K = (H-G) + (J-G);*/
K = rotate(-90, H) * G;
D = rotate(-90, A) * B;
E = D + B;

picture sangaku;
path vierkantac=A--C--G--F--cycle;;
path vierkantbc=C--B--I--H--cycle;;
path vierkantgh=G--H--K--J--cycle;
path vierkantab=B--A--D--E--cycle;

path driehoekae=A--B--E--cycle;
path driehoekgh=G--H--K--cycle;

pen p1=orange;
pen p2=cyan;

filldraw (sangaku, vierkantac, p1);
filldraw (sangaku, vierkantbc, p1);
draw (sangaku, vierkantgh);
draw (sangaku, vierkantab);


pair positie=(2, 12);

The line K = (H-G) + (J-G);, which I have commented out, is giving me trouble:

enter image description here

With the rotate function I get the right result:

enter image description here

But why should they not be equivalent?


In this case a correct would be K = G+(H-G) + (J-G);. The error comes from common misconception that points an vectors are the same, while in fact they are not. It is easy to grasp the difference, with one more coordinate added to mark it: it is 0 for vectors, and 1 for a valid point. Then it is clear, that any sum (+/-) of vectors will result in a valid vector, the difference of two points is a vector, and to get a valid point, the vector has to be added to another point. (Sum of the points are only valid, if the mentioned extra coordinate of the result is also 1). In particular, in the commented line K clearly is a sum of two vectors (H-G) and (J-G), to make it a point, another proper point has to be added, in this case it is G.

  • I wonder why I didn't see that. Thanks! – qed Oct 28 '13 at 17:50
  • @qed: Well, we humans, not octopuses, we all have a blind spot in the eye by design. – g.kov Oct 28 '13 at 18:13
  • Adding on the extra coordinate to distinguish vectors from points is a neat trick! – Charles Staats Oct 28 '13 at 18:49
  • @Charles Staats: It is indeed. Unfortunately it is rarely found in geometry textbooks. – g.kov Oct 28 '13 at 19:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.