I am at a technical university where there are no templates and rules for writing a dissertation, especially not regarding the bibliography style. My supervisor prefers the author-year style, as it is a case with most publications in my field. After all, being in a small field with not so many researchers and papers, the paper behind a reference in the text such as "Smith et al. (2004)" is immediately obvious to a reader without checking the list in the back matter. However, for aesthetic and other reasons like my research being close to computer science, I prefer the numerical style which my supervisor does not approve. Hence, I am looking for a compromise in between the two. Does anyone have a recommendation for a style which would be in between, and its LaTeX/BibTeX implementation? My idea was to use something like:

In their research, Smith et al. [4-6] show that...


In their 2004 paper [4], Smith et al. show...

I have seen also the footnote style, as a fusion between the two styles, but having >300 references would result in too much space used for the footnote area.

closed as unclear what you're asking by Christoph, Gonzalo Medina, ChrisS, cmhughes, Guido Mar 2 '14 at 4:05

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    It should be rather straightforward to implement this with biblatex/biber. See e.g. tex.stackexchange.com/a/135095/2388 – Ulrike Fischer Nov 1 '13 at 13:05
  • Thanks Ulrike, I have never used biblatex. Now it seems the time to start. – 528 Nov 2 '13 at 19:05
  • This question appears to be off-topic because it has been resolved following the comments – cmhughes Mar 2 '14 at 3:56