6

I use the bm package.

This is the expression I use:

\bm{A=\sqrt{B^2+C^2}}

My letters are bold as expected, but the square root is thinner and more ugly than without \bm.

Everything looks fine when using 

\bm{A=\sqrt{C}}

So I guess it has something to do with space.

Does somebody know how to fix this?

Improve this question
6
  • Welcome to TeX.sx! Usually, we don't put a greeting or a “thank you” in our posts. While this might seem strange at first, it is not a sign of lack of politeness, but rather part of our trying to keep everything very concise. Accepting and upvoting answers is the preferred way here to say “thank you” to users who helped you.
    – masu
    Dec 11, 2013 at 11:14
  • 2
    are you loading amsmath? If yes, you need to put the \sqrt{} macro in braces, like this: $\bm{A={\sqrt{B^2+C^2}}}$. Then it'll work. See page 9 of the bm manual.
    – Old Nick
    Dec 11, 2013 at 11:17
  • 1
    @dcmst page 9? actually \sqrt seems to need {} whether or not amsmath loaded, I'm sure it didn't used to
    – David Carlisle
    Dec 11, 2013 at 12:16
  • @DavidCarlisle yup, you're right, it needs {} in both cases. I tried only the working cases without amsmath (like \sqrt{C}) and they obviously worked. This, plus I think I misread the referenced page.
    – Old Nick
    Dec 11, 2013 at 12:28
  • 1
    @dcmst see my answer :(
    – David Carlisle
    Dec 11, 2013 at 13:02

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
5

Ah.

This can not possibly be a bug, so it must be a (only slightly) documented feature.

As mentioned in the bm manual, commands with optional arguments are locally modified inside \bm specifically so that \bm{\sqrt{xyz}} works. To see why you need \bm{{\sqrt{...}}} with an extra pair of braces in your example, consider:

enter image description here

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{bm}
\showoutput
\begin{document}

$\sqrt{1x}$ 

$\sqrt{2x^2}$

$\sqrt{3x\strut^2}$

$\bm{\sqrt{4x^2}}$

$\bm{\sqrt{5x}}$

$\bm{{\sqrt{6x^2}}}$

\boldmath

$\sqrt{7x^2}$

$\sqrt{8x\strut^2}$

\end{document}

Looking at the relevant bit of the log file

$ grep \\\\OM[SX] bm111.log 
......\OMS/cmsy/m/n/10 p
......\OMS/cmsy/m/n/10 p
......\OMX/cmex/m/n/5 q
......\OMS/cmsy/b/n/10 p
......\OMS/cmsy/b/n/10 p
.........\OMS/cmsy/b/n/10 p
......\OMS/cmsy/b/n/10 p
......\OMX/cmex/m/n/5 q

You can see that "small" radicals come from the symbol font OMS/cmsy/m which has a bold version installed OMS/cmsy/b but large radicals come from the symbol extension font OMX/cmex/m which in the standard Computer Modern font set doesn't have a bold version. Your case with a superscripted capital is on a tipping point, if bm sets it all together (due to the extra braces) the cramped style is used, the radical gets chosen from cmsy and goes bold, but without the extra help the radical comes from cmex for which there is no bold font.

Improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.