6

I'm pretty new to LaTeX and BibTeX so I apologise in advance if I'm missing information or this seems like it should be simple!

I have three papers by one author which I would like to cite in the text such as "

as specified by Smith (1990, 1995, 2001)

but have as three separate references in the bibliography.

Is there a way to do this? I am using the ametsoc bibliography style at the moment, and can't seem to find a solution other than citing it as [Smith(1990), Smith(1995, Smith(2001)].

1

1 Answer 1

5

Assuming you've loaded a citation management package such as natbib with a command such as

\usepackage{natbib}

and assuming further the three entries have been given the "keys" smith:1990, smith:1995, and smith:2001, you could issue the command

\cite{smith:1990, smith:2001, smith:1995} % note: entries needn't be sorted chronologically

to generate a citation of the form

Smith (1990, 1995, 2001)

The natbib package will sort the arguments of the \cite command chronologically.

(If you were using the harvard citation management package, you'd type \citeasnoun{smith:1990, smith:2001, smith:1995} to get the same result.)

6
  • The user uses ametsoc which is compatible with natbib. Commented Dec 12, 2013 at 20:10
  • Thank you both for your help! Apologies for the missing info, I am indeed using the natbib package. My references in my .bib file are as such: "@ARTICLE{Smith1990, AUTHOR="J. Smith", TITLE="Meteorology Stuff", JOURNAL="AMS Journal", VOLUME= "1", PAGES= "1-10", YEAR=1990 } and of course the other two, with different years, titles etc. I am not sure how to use \cite{} to have it call just the years. Experimenting with your example gives me "??" when i run pdflatex and bibtex. I'm sure I'm missing something simple!
    – CoffeeBean
    Commented Dec 12, 2013 at 21:40
  • @CoffeeBean - Does \cite{Smith1990, Smith2001, Smith1995} (note the uppercasing/lowercasing matters) work, possibly after blowing away the .aux and .bbl files and then running LaTeX, BibTeX, and LaTeX twice more on your main source file?
    – Mico
    Commented Dec 12, 2013 at 21:48
  • @Mico - Thanks, yes it does! I tried this initially but was having some problems with the ametsoc style anyway and it didn't seem this simple. This has helped clear up how some of this works for me thankfully!
    – CoffeeBean
    Commented Dec 12, 2013 at 22:00
  • @CoffeeBean - Glad to learn you're up and running! Please feel free to upvote and/or accept/checkmark my answer. ;-)
    – Mico
    Commented Dec 12, 2013 at 22:07

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .