1

I am looking to adjust this table in two ways:

-Firstly, I would like the second = to be more to the right, next to the $P_{S}(K|GB)$. -Secondly, I would like the table to take up as much width as possible, such that it almost forms one single line (it won't really be a single line as the text is just too long for that, which is the whole reason I am constructing this table like this).

Thank you for your insight.

\begin{table}[h]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{lllcrrrcc}
\multicolumn{2}{l}{$P_{S}(A|GB)$} & $=$ & & $=$ & \multicolumn{2}{r}{$P_{S}(K|GB)$} &     \multirow{2}{*}{for} & \multirow{2}{*}{$p>\frac{1}{2}$}\\
 & \multicolumn{2}{r}{$p(1-e_{1})+(1-p)(e_{1})$} & $>$ & \multicolumn{2}{l}{$p(1-e_{2})+(1-p)(e_{2})$} & & & 
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Receiver's conditional payoffs}
\label{eq:Label}
\end{table}
1

I solved it in the following manner:

\begin{table}[h]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{llrcrrrrc}
\multicolumn{2}{l}{$P_{S}(A|GG) =$} & $1$ & $>$ & $1$ & \multicolumn{2}{r}{$= P_{S}(K|GG)$} & \hspace{2mm} for & any value
\vspace{4mm}\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{$P_{S}(A|GB) =$} & & & & \multicolumn{2}{r}{$= P_{S}(K|GB)$} &     \hspace{2mm} \multirow{2}{*}{for} & \multirow{2}{*}{$p>\frac{1}{2}$}\\
\hspace{8mm} & \multicolumn{2}{r}{$p(1-e_{1})+(1-p)(e_{1})$} & $>$ & \multicolumn{2}{l}{$p(1-e_{2})+(1-p)(e_{2})$} & \hspace{8mm} & & 
\vspace{4mm}\\
\multicolumn{2}{l}{$P_{S}(A|BB) =$} & $0$ & $>$ & $0$ & \multicolumn{2}{r}{$= P_{S}(K|BB)$} & \hspace{2mm} for & any value
\vspace{4mm}
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Receiver's conditional payoffs}
\label{eq:Label}
\end{table}

If anyone knows a better/sleeker method, please let me know.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.