4

I want to draw this formula using chemfig:

BCA Cu+ Complex

This is what I've got so far:

\chemfig{Cu^+(-[:180]N**6(-**6(------)--(-OOC-)---))(-[1]N)(-[5]N)(-[7]N)}

my try

I don't get the angle from N to Cu+ right. I tried to rotate parts of the formula, but there is always at least one angle that does not fit.

Any idea?

1
7

Yes, I have an idea:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{chemfig}
\begin{document}
\definesubmol\cc{**6(---!\ff-!\ee--)}
\definesubmol\dd{**6(-!\ee--!\ff---)}
\definesubmol\ee{**6(-----)}
\definesubmol\ff[(-^{-}OOC)]{(-COO^{-})}
\chemfig{Cu^+(-[1]N([0,.5]!\cc))(-[3]N([:180,.5]!\dd))(-[5]N([:180,.5]!\cc))(-[7]N([:0,.5]!\dd))}
\end{document}

enter image description here

1

The following code is similar to what unbonpetit wrote. The term .5 in [0,.5] and [180,.5] is chosen such that the aromatic cycles do not get too big.

\documentclass{standalone}
\usepackage{chemfig}
\begin{document}
\chemfig{Cu^+
(-[:+ 45]N([0,.5]**6(---(-COO^{-})-**6(------)--)))
(-[:+135]N([180,.5]**6(-**6(------)--(-^{-}OOC)---)))
(-[:+225]N([180,.5]**6(---(-^{-}OOC)-**6(------)--)))
(-[:+315]N([0,.5]**6(-**6(------)--(-COO^{-})---)))}
\end{document}

enter image description here

3
  • @unbonpetit: I don't see the point...
    – strpeter
    Dec 31 '13 at 16:28
  • It is not exactly the same since your inner ring has 6 bonds instead of 5. Moreover, your code is not more or less explicit than mine, even after several edits.
    – unbonpetit
    Dec 31 '13 at 16:29
  • I must admit that the term "explicit" is misleading.
    – strpeter
    Dec 31 '13 at 16:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.