I've been emailed a 'sample' document that I'm supposed to cut/copy/paste to my needs. However, it seems like it's full of problems. The first thing that keeps coming up is:

./testit.tex:9: Argument of \begin has an extra }.

The document:



\tablecaption{\bf NGC 2264 members monitored with {\em CoRoT} and {\em
\colhead{Object} & \colhead{2MASS id} & \colhead{CoRoT id} & \colhead{J} & \colhead{H} &
\colhead{K} & \colhead{[3.6]} & \colhead{[4.5]} & \colhead{[5.8]} & \colhead{[8.0]} &
\colhead{[24]} & \colhead{Class} & \colhead{SpT} &
\colhead{H$\alpha$} & \colhead{Comp?}}
CSI Mon-000007 & J06415304+0958028 & 223994721 & 12.22$\pm$0.02 & 11.53$\pm$0.03 & 11.18$\pm$0.02 & 10.12$\pm$0.00 & 9.74$\pm$0.00 & 9.32$\pm$0.00 & 8.75$\pm$0.00 & 6.20$\pm$0.03 & II & K7 & - & Y \\
CSI Mon-000011 & J06411725+0954323 & 223985009 & 12.83$\pm$0.02 & 12.05$\pm$0.03 & 11.55$\pm$0.02 & 10.49$\pm$0.00 & 10.07$\pm$0.00 & 9.69$\pm$0.00 & 8.82$\pm$0.00 & 5.60$\pm$0.01 & II & K7 & 58.30 & N \\
CSI Mon-006491 & J06392550+0931394 & 616920065 & 13.77$\pm$0.03 & 12.86$\pm$0.03 & 12.38$\pm$0.02 & 11.73$\pm$0.00 & 11.44$\pm$0.00 & 11.15$\pm$0.01 & 10.52$\pm$0.01 & 7.86$\pm$0.03 & II & - & - & N 
\tablecomments{We have assembled a list of NGC~2264 region members,
  candidates, and field stars, called the CSI~Mon catalog. Here we
  show only the Mon identification numbers of objects discussed in
  this paper. The {\em CoRoT} ids are from the SRa05 run. H$\alpha$ refers to the equivalent
 width of the H$\alpha$ emission line, and we adopt the values of \citet{2002AJ....123.1528R} and \citet{2005AJ....129..829D}. 
  Spectral types are from \citet{1956ApJS....2..365W}, \citet{2004AJ....127.2228M}, 
  and \citet{2005AJ....129..829D}, Objects with the disk class II/III
  are have a class III SED based on the slope, but have significant
  evidence of a weak disk based on their [3.6]-[8.0] colors. The ``comp''
  column denotes whether the object appears to have a companion within
  1\arcsec (``Y'' if yes). Detection is based on visual binarity or elongation of the
  PSF reported by \citet{2009AJ....138.1116S}, or spectroscopic indications of
  binarity via variable radial velocity measured by \citet{2006ApJ...648.1090F}.
  Objects with no known companion (``N'') may still be
  undetected binaries. *Objects with IRAC staring data are marked with 

Why is it saying this? I don't see anything obvious (to me, at least).

  • 5
    Where is \end{landscape}?? – Sigur Jan 20 '14 at 23:15
  • 4
    Where is \end{document}?? – cfr Jan 20 '14 at 23:21
  • 3
    Isn't longtable an environment? – You Jan 20 '14 at 23:22
  • what is \begin{deluxetable}? – Rmano Jan 21 '14 at 0:15

Package longtable defines an environment longtable that takes a mandatory argument, the specification for the columns. Thus the following token \begin becomes the argument for \longtable.

Since a table is following \begin{landscape}, the previous \longtable is probably just a typo. If you remove it, the file compiles (after adding \end{landscape} and \end{document}.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.