I am typesetting a long mathematical text (lecture notes), in which I use the alphabets

\mathbb A
\mathcal A
\mathfrak A

very often, so I decided to name them

\A \sA \fA

(For bb A, script A, fraktur A resp.). Now I want to shorten my preamble by creating a helper

    \newcommand{\#1}{\mathbb #1}
    \newcommand{\s#1}{\mathcal #1}
    \newcommand{\f#1}{\mathfrak #1}

which doesn't work since the \#1 etc. seem to not be expanded.
How can I wirte a macro which defines those three commands given a single letter as input?

Thanks for any help.

  • It is strange. Why not define 3 new commands? If your code works what would you type: \mathletter{A}? – Sigur Jan 27 '14 at 14:23
  • Because that means 26*3 = 78 lines of code vs. 36+5 = 41 lines, about half and much more readable than a bunch of \newcommand{\X}{\mathbb X} lines – AlexR Jan 27 '14 at 14:26
  • 2
    This might be what you're looking for: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28704/… – Snicksie Jan 27 '14 at 14:30
  • 1
    Does this suffice: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \def\B#1{\mathbb #1} \def\C#1{\mathcal #1} \def\F#1{\mathfrak #1} \begin{document} $\B A \C A \F A $ \end{document} – Steven B. Segletes Jan 27 '14 at 14:34
  • 1
    @AlexR, you don't need to retype. You can use Find/Replace tools. – Sigur Jan 27 '14 at 14:37

Thanks to @Snicksie, I have been able to come up with the following:

Note that this is not really "beautiful" and that it overwrites the commands \H,\L,\O,\P,\S but I have confirmed that I need none of them and "manually" undefined them so I get errors when I oversee any other commands.

    \expandafter\newcommand\csname #1\endcsname{\mathbb #1}
    \expandafter\newcommand\csname s#1\endcsname{\mathcal #1}
    \expandafter\newcommand\csname f#1\endcsname{\mathfrak #1}
\mathletter A
\mathletter B
\mathletter C
\mathletter Z

Another very elegant solution, thanks to @StevenB.Segelets is to define:

\def\B#1{\mathbb #1}
\def\C#1{\mathcal #1}
\def\F#1{\mathfrak #1}

And use those slighly different commands then. This doesn't redefine any existing macros and therefor is probably a cleaner solution, but requires to change previous syntax (\A, \sA, \fA) in all documents and thus requires some "rewriting".

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.