I'm discussing fuel efficiency in liters per 100 kilometers (L/100 km). My first thought was to do the following:

% renders: L/100km

However, that omits the space between 100 and km. Appending whitespace to the end of 100 has no effect, as I expected. However, adding whitespace outside of \num does work:

\si[per-mode=symbol]{\liter\per\num{100} \kilo\meter}}
% renders: L/100 km

But that seems clunky. Is there a better way? Nothing in the docs is catching my eye: ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/ctan%3A/macros/latex/exptl/siunitx/siunitx.pdf

  • Remove \num ? But I think what you want is not standard because then it becomes arithmetic in words I would read it as L/100-many kilometers – percusse Mar 11 '14 at 20:29
  • @percusse Exact same situation as with \num, unfortunately. I'm open to the idea that this is how you do it, but it seems like there'd be a better way given the depth of the package. – Paul H Mar 11 '14 at 20:31
  • I get a space with \liter\per100 \kilo\meter. Note that num puts the contents in mathmode so spaces are ignored. And lastly I would use frac mode with no ambiguity – percusse Mar 11 '14 at 20:32
  • @percusse so do I, but that seems equally clunky given how \SI{>> 5}{\metre} renders a space between the 5 and m – Paul H Mar 11 '14 at 20:34
  • That's not a unit but the quantity hence the space in between. – percusse Mar 11 '14 at 20:36

There are at least a couple of ways of handling this. You could simple type things in in literal mode, or you could create a new unit to represent '100 km':


\si{l/100~km} \si[per-mode = symbol]{\litre\per\Ckm}

  • +1, but why not \hkm as hecto-? In my language ckm is a heavy machine-gun. :-) – Przemysław Scherwentke May 29 '16 at 22:09
  • @PrzemysławScherwentke Roman numeral representation – Joseph Wright May 30 '16 at 8:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.