5

We are putting together latex classes for books. We want to make a certain tree style the default for forest. With the example below one has to define the style (sn edges) in every tree. Is there a way to get rid of this specification and make it the default?

\documentclass{minimal}

\usepackage{forest}

\forestset{
sn edges/.style={for tree={parent anchor=south, child anchor=north,align=center,base=bottom,where n children=0{tier=word}{}}}, 
background tree/.style={for tree={text opacity=0.2,draw opacity=0.2,edge={draw opacity=0.2}}}
}


\begin{document}

\begin{forest}
sn edges
[S
  [NP [er\\he] ]
  [NP
    [Det [das\\the] ]
    [N [Buch\\book] ] 
  ]
  [NP
    [Det [der\\the] ]
    [N [Frau\\woman] ] 
  ]
  [V [gibt\\gives] ]
]
\end{forest}

\end{document}
9

Not sure if the question is unsolved Stefan, but this code for instance is applied to all forest environments:

\forestset{.style={for tree={l=1em, l sep=1em, s sep=1em}}}

In essence, just drop the style name :)

Hope this helps.

  • 2
    You can also say \forestset{.style={sn edges}} – Andrew Swann May 13 '14 at 12:53
  • 3
    I had no idea this is possible, and I'm the author of forest :-) However, to make the issue clearer, the next version will implement key default preamble. Usage just as above: \forestset{default preamble/.style={sn edges}}} – Sašo Živanović Dec 11 '14 at 14:24
  • 1
    @SašoŽivanović, Are you indicating in your example that the sn edges style will be pre-loaded by forest so that the code for the style doesn't have be copied into the preamble? I like the flexibility and simple syntax of forest, and it's great for compact trees, but I hesitate to recommend it to my linguistics students because it doesn't work "out of the box" the way tikz-qtree does. If I could tell them to just use \usepackage[linguistics]{forest} where the linguistics option would load sn edges and nice empty nodes for every tree, that would be great. – Jason Zentz Jul 22 '15 at 19:42
  • 1
    The feature will be added in v1.1. This summer, promise! ;-) Thanks for the \usepackage[linguistics]{forest} idea, I like it! – Sašo Živanović Jul 22 '15 at 22:36
  • 1
    Progress report: it took a long time and lots of work, but I'm finally in the testing phase. TeX.SE is a great help here, as I'm checking for discrepancies between v1.0.x and v1.1 using the code posted on this site! – Sašo Živanović Oct 24 '15 at 2:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.