1

I have a problem with this expression:

$$n \geq \Bigg\lvert \bigcup_{l \leq |A_{i}| \leq 2l} |A_{i}| \Bigg\rvert \geq \sum_{i = 1}^{N_{l}}\Bigg\lvert A_{i} \Biggl \bigcup_{j =1}^{i-1} A_{j}\Biggr \Bigg\rvert$$

The report is:

`* Local config file bblopts.cfg used * ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\00miktex\bblopts.cfg") ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\generic\babel\italian.ldf" ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\generic\babel\babel.def"))) (C:\Users\Stefano1\Desktop\Seminario\Seminario.aux) ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\amsfonts\umsa.fd") ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\amsfonts\umsb.fd") ("C:\Program Files\MiKTeX 2.9\tex\latex\base\omscmr.fd") [1{C:/ProgramData/MiKT eX/2.9/pdftex/config/pdftex.map}] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] ! Missing delimiter (. inserted). \bigcup@ l.296 ...}^{N_{l}}\Bigg\lvert A_{i} \Biggl \bigcup {j =1}^{i-1} A{j}\Biggr ...

? `

I don't understand where is the error.

  • 1
    Don't use $$. This is outdated. Use one $ for inline or \[ \] for display. – LaRiFaRi Apr 3 '14 at 9:11
5

Both after one \Biggl and one \Biggr a delimiter, such as \lvert or \rvert or any other (parenthessis, brace, dot), is missing. There's just a blank and another command following.

Compilable example code:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
\begin{document}
\[
  n \geq \Bigg\lvert \bigcup_{l \leq |A_{i}| \leq 2l} |A_{i}|
  \Bigg\rvert \geq \sum_{i = 1}^{N_{l}}\Bigg\lvert A_{i} \Biggl\lvert
  \bigcup_{j =1}^{i-1} A_{j}\Biggr\rvert \Bigg\rvert
\]
\end{document}

Output

  • As you just write, it would be great to have all \Bigg changed to \Biggl \Biggr and so on. – Manuel Apr 3 '14 at 10:08
  • I think the expression would look even better if you replaced all \Bigg directives with \bigg: Just as it's not desirable in general, to surround a summation sign with upper and lower limits with parentheses that fully enclose the entire expression, the vertical bars generated by \Bigg seem oppresively tall; switching to \bigg[lr] will give less visual prominence to the fences, without creating any uncertainty as to what's being enclosed. – Mico Apr 3 '14 at 11:12

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.