3

I have the following.

\item Arrange in ascending order (smallest to largest): $−6, −2, 0, 1, −5, 4, 3$

But this output does not have negative signs.

6, 2, 0, 1, 5, 4, 3

It shows negative in other places.

\item Evaluate $(-2)^2$

This output has a negative sign.

Evaluate (−2)2

What am I doing wrong here?

Thank you in advance.

0

2 Answers 2

9

The minus signs in $−6, −2, 0, 1, −5, 4, 3$ are not hyphens - (0x2d) but dashes (0x2212). A dash is slightly longer than a hyphen.

Solution: Replace dashes with hyphens.

The minus sign in \item Evaluate $(-2)^2$ is already a hyphen.

4
  • 2
    Note that \usepackage{lmodern} is extremely illuminating in this respect!
    – cfr
    Apr 11, 2014 at 3:03
  • 2
    Thanks. It happened so because I copy and paste it from MS Word.
    – shin
    Apr 11, 2014 at 3:05
  • @shin That warning is good to know, re: MS Word. Apr 11, 2014 at 3:47
  • 1
    The advice is correct but note that U+2212 isn't a "dash" it is "MINUS SIGN" so typographically it's the correct character, so in unicode-math it should work, but for classic tex, as you say you should use - just as you should use ` and ' rather than typographical left and right qutes as TeX input. Apr 11, 2014 at 6:52
2

If you're doing much copy-paste from word processors, then it's better to load

\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}

in your LaTeX document. Then you can teach LaTeX new correspondences between Unicode characters and LaTeX set of known objects, in this case

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{newunicodechar}

%% the first is the “unknown minus” (U+2212), the second is a hyphen
\newunicodechar{−}{-}

\begin{document}
$−1$
\end{document}

How do you know there's something amiss? Look in the .log file: you should find several instances of something like

Missing character: There is no <E2> in font cmr10!
Missing character: There is no <88> in font cmr10!
Missing character: There is no <92> in font cmr10!

one for each “disappearing” minus sign. Indeed, if you don't load inputenc with the utf8 option, TeX just sees the three byte representation of U+2212, precisely the bytes 0xE2, 0x88 and 0x92 that don't correspond to a printable character, because the default TeX fonts have only 128 glyphs.

With utf8, but no \newunicodechar declaration you'd get an error:

! Package inputenc Error: Unicode char \u8:− not set up for use with LaTeX.

and you can so understand what went wrong: the minus sign is not understood. Copy it and use it for defining the correct \newunicodechar declaration.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .