I'm using libertine
with newtxmath
. Actually it is very good but some symbols don't seem good to me as in the figure.
Can I use different font from these symbols like given below without changing the other ones? (these are from mathpazo
.)
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[lining]{libertine}
\usepackage[libertine,cmintegrals]{newtxmath}
\usepackage{ucs}
\usepackage{amsfonts,amsmath,amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
%------------TIKZ-PGF----------------
\usepackage{tikz,pgf,pgfplots}
\pgfplotsset{compat=1.10}
\usepgfplotslibrary{fillbetween}
\usetikzlibrary{shapes.multipart}
\usetikzlibrary{patterns}
%---------------------------------
\begin{document}
\[
f\left( \mathbf{x}|\theta\right) =\underset{h\left( \mathbf{x}\right)
}{\underbrace{1}}\cdot\underset{g_{1}\left( T\left( \mathbf{X}_{1}\right)
|\mu\right) }{\underbrace{\left( 2\pi\sigma^{2}\right) ^{-n/2}\exp\left[
-\frac{n\left( \overline{x}-\mu\right) ^{2}}{2\sigma^{2}}\right] }%
}\underset{g_{2}\left( T\left( \mathbf{X}_{2}\right) |\sigma\right)
}{\underbrace{\exp\left[ \frac{-1}{2\sigma^{2}}\sum\left( x_{i}-\overline
{x}\right) ^{2}\right] }}%
\]
\[\sqrt{\exp\left[ \frac{-1}{2\sigma^{2}}\sum\left( x_{i}-\overline
{x}\right) ^{2}\right]}\]
$\forall\exists= \pm+-$
\end{document}
newtxmath
provides alternatives for\forall
and\exists
, namely\forallAlt
and\existxAlt
\existsAlt
?