4
\documentclass[a4paper, 11pt, notitlepage]{report}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\theoremstyle{plain}
\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}[section] % reset theorem numbering for each chapter
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{props}[thm]{Proposition}

\begin{document}
\begin{props} [[1], p. 180]
\end{props}
\end{document}

The result would be:

Proposition 0.0.1 ([1). , p. 180]

How do I make it like this:

Proposition 0.0.1 ([1], p. 180)

I'm using TeXStudio with XeLaTeX.

5
  • 2
    Just write begin{props} [[1{]}, p. 180] or begin{props} [[{1]}, p. 180]. – Bernard Apr 21 '14 at 10:08
  • @Bernard - I noticed your comment only after I posted my answer. I've updated the answer to mention your solution. – Mico Apr 21 '14 at 10:19
  • @Mico: That's nothing. It also happens to me from time to time. What's more important, I think, is your suggestion to use a citation command. – Bernard Apr 21 '14 at 10:29
  • What's the purpose {} there? Does it work like \ in math mode? Thanks for your answer. – hans-t Apr 21 '14 at 10:40
  • 2
    No, it's only a way to isolate it — for LaTeX there is an ambiguity due to the fact that you use an optional argument that is introduced by a [. That is why, semantically, I prefer to write {[1]} rather than [1{]}, though both work. – Bernard Apr 21 '14 at 11:20
4

You could load the mathtools package and use its commands \lbrack and \rbrack -- note that they need to be used in math mode -- to typeset square brackets in a way that doesn't trip up LaTeX. I.e., you'd write

\begin{props}[$\lbrack 1\rbrack]$, p.~180]

Addendum: I just noticed the comment posted by @Bernard: An even easier solution is to write

\begin{props}[{[1]}, p.~180]

Presumably, though, the [1] element is a call-out to an entry in the bibliography. Have you tried \begin{props}[\cite{whatever}, p.~180], where "whatever" is the citation key of the entry in question? Assuming you're using a numeric citation style, the \cite command will generate the [1] element for you in a way that doesn't interfere with \begin{props}.

2
  • I wish I could use \cite, but I have problem with that as well: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/172579/… – hans-t Apr 21 '14 at 10:41
  • @user74158 - I've added some comments at the end of your earlier posting. Please be more specific as to the problems you're encountering. – Mico Apr 21 '14 at 10:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.