9

This paper by Vi Hart and Henry Segerman has some interesting hand-drawn images that cry out for a treatment with your favourite TeX-friendly package. I like the concept of throwing up one's hands and saying 'forget it; hand-drawn images it is', but it's just as cool to see such interesting figures done by code.

Figure 1 c) is easy (for those in the know), figure 2 (or some minor variation on it) is do-able, but the 3D model of the cube with the appropriately perspectivised images on faces could be challenging. Figures 3 and 4 should follow from figure 2.

To give a concrete question:

Can figure 5 from the linked paper be generated programmatically? It seems completely systematic to me.

Figure 5 from arxiv:1404.6596

8
  • 4
    Forget it; hand-drawn images it is. :) – Sean Allred Apr 30 '14 at 3:47
  • 7
    No way should this be CW. It's going to take some serious work to make those (IMHO) and whoever attempts it should get their dues in rep. – Andrew Stacey Apr 30 '14 at 4:10
  • 1
    @SeanAllred - thanks for the image! – theHigherGeometer Apr 30 '14 at 4:14
  • 1
    While I understand that it's ok to have some "how can I draw this fancy picture" questions, this one doesn't seem to be reasonable at all. The figure is not suitable to be drawn in any way but by hand or in a professional 3D software. However, TeX is not such a software, not even with TikZ or PSTricks. Therefore I think the question is off-topic. – yo' Apr 30 '14 at 7:14
  • 1
    @vonbrand - definitely not looking for a hand-drawn look here, but a clean version with the same information. – theHigherGeometer Apr 30 '14 at 7:49

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.