I am using Biblatex for bibliography. This works fine with builtin styles like ieee. But when I gave a custom bst file I got it gives me not found error.

My command was


I put the file splncs.bst in the same folder containing the tex and bib file.

Biblatex works fine when inbuilt styles are used

  • 5
    You cannot use .bst files with biblatex. biblatex styles are .bbx and .cbx files. – moewe May 1 '14 at 14:18
  • Can convert between these two? What should be done if i get a bst file? – tex May 1 '14 at 14:41
  • 1
    There is no standard conversion way from .bst to .bbx/.cbx. If you have to use a .bst file, better use BibTeX. If there is just a general style you have to follow, you might be able to cook that style up with biblatex. – moewe May 1 '14 at 14:43
  • 1
    @moewe -- Until the unlikely event that someone actually creates a bst-->bbx/cbx converter, your comments are the answer.... To the OP: while it is a lot of work to create a fully correct and complete bibliography/citation style, if your needs are personal and (somewhat) circumscribed, it is possible to implement a style for use with biblatex without too much work. There are many serious biblatex hackers who frequent this site if you have questions. – jon May 1 '14 at 18:28

biblatex uses a different style format (.bbx, .cbx, .lbx) than BibTeX (.bst). That means you cannot use your .bst files (BibTeX styles/\bibliographystyles) together with biblatex (or Biber, for that matter).

Note also that you can't use your .bst files with Biber. While Biber is a replacement for BibTeX when used for biblatex, it can not deal with .bst files at all and so would be of no use as a replacement for BibTeX in the classic BibTeX bibliography set-up.

As far as I'm aware there is no "converter" for .bst to .bbx/.cbx, and it is very unlikely that someone will actually create such a converter. Joseph suggests in the comment that this is impossible.

As a general rule: If you have to use a certain .bst file (because you institution requires you to do so, your publisher insists on a certain template etc.) it is best to go with BibTeX and the exact setup recommended in the guidelines. If you just happen to like a particular .bst file, you can check first if someone has created a biblatex style for it (a list of styles can be found here), if that is not the case, you can try and create the style yourself.

To implement a bibliography style yourself, first choose an appropriate basis for your style, find the standard biblatex style that comes closest to your intended style (as a rule of thumb the standard styles are easier to modify than heavily customised styles like biblatex-chicago, biblatex-apa, these only lends themselves to be used as a basis if the changes needed are miniscule). According to this, that would probably numeric in your case.

Then you go on to modify the style to your needs. A started is Guidelines for customizing biblatex styles, but there are much more questions about all kinds of customisations on this site.

  • 1
    I'd go further than 'very unlikely' on auto-conversion: once you give this some thought it's impossible. Such a conversion would need some form of structure to be available in the input, and .bst files are entirely arbitrary. – Joseph Wright May 3 '14 at 6:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.