Consider the following MWE:





It generates both the "Missing number, treated as zero" and "Illegal unit of measure (pt inserted)" error messages. Why?

(My goal is to have 2 spaced equations on one line but no equation number for that line. I realize I can accomplish this with something like \begin{align} \nonumber a&=1 & b&=2\\ c\end{align} but why is this necessary?)

  • 1
    And what's wrong with \begin{align} \nonumber a&=1 & b&=2\\ c\end{align}? That seems to be the correct thing to do...
    – yo'
    Commented May 1, 2014 at 20:51
  • If you want one line why are you breaking the line with double back slashes?
    – Sigur
    Commented May 1, 2014 at 20:53
  • And \begin{align*} ... \end{align*} would drop the equation number!
    – user31729
    Commented May 1, 2014 at 20:54
  • Using \cr instead of \\ avoids generating an equation number for that line. E.g. \begin{align}a\cr b\end{align} only generates one equation number whereas \begin{align}a\\ b\end{align} generates 2. (@Sigur: I actually want more than one line or, sometimes, I just want the equation number on a new line) Commented May 1, 2014 at 20:55
  • 4
    even though \cr may underly the double backslash mechanism for ending a line, it isn't recommended to use "plain tex" code in the multi-line display structures defined by amsmath. stick to what's documented in the user manual (texdoc amsmath). \notag will suppress the equation number for one line. Commented May 1, 2014 at 21:00

1 Answer 1


\cr is not a LaTeX command (it is a TeX primitive) and its use in the middle of an AMS alignment causes a chunk of the alignment code to be omitted as the correct code \\sets up a lot of the internal measurement data before calling \cr internally to finish the row.

If you add \tracingall and compare the logs with \cr and \\ then you will see that the specific cause of the error is that \cr did not terminate the cell as intended and so the \maxcolumn@widths macro was not correctly updated with the column widths.

With \cr it is

\maxcolumn@widths -> \or 0.0pt \or 0.0pt

but with \\ it is

\maxcolumn@widths -> \or 0.0pt \or 0.0pt \or 0.0pt \or 0.0pt \or 0.0pt

align uses an \ifcase to extract the relevant length as it considers each column

but as it is too short, once it gets to column 3 it uses \ifcase3 which means that it tries to read past this \or list and you get:

\maxcolumn@widths -> \or 0.0pt \or 0.0pt
{case 3}
! Missing number, treated as zero.
<to be read again> 

Don't use TeX primitives in the middle of complicated LaTeX code:-)

  • OK. That's a very informative answer (and I also want to acknowledge @barbarabeeton who gave a similar, though less detailed, comment). It's funny that I haven't really seen this point stressed anywhere (in fact, if I search for "latex amsmath cr" in google right now, this question is the second result ;-). It's easy enough to remedy this with a macro defined as `\nonumber\`. Commented May 2, 2014 at 11:35

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .