So to "comment out" a line, I need to insert a % at the beginning of the line (so that line will not be compiled).

Is there way to comment out a large section without having to manually putting a % in front of each line?

  • Can you explain the sort of situations you want to do this in? If, for example, it's to reduce compile times when writing a long document then you may find it best to use something like the subfiles package. This would mean you don't have to remove the commented out sections before compiling the whole document, but you could still compile individual parts of the document with the proper preamble, and without changing anything except for which file you pass to LaTeX. – Edd May 10 '11 at 11:03
  • Related: Multi-line (block) comments – Scott H. Jan 12 '13 at 17:41
  • 4
    I think the most comprehensive answer is still this one from the UK TeX FAQ: tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=conditional – Blaisorblade Nov 1 '13 at 14:26

12 Answers 12


You can use \iffalse ... \fi to make (La)TeX not compile everything between it. However, this might not work properly if you have unmatched \ifxxx ... \fi pairs inside them or do something else special with if-switches. It should be fine for normal user text.

There is also the comment package which gives you the comment environment which ignores everything in it verbatim. It allows you to define own environments and to switch them on and off.

  • 6
    make sure to \usepackage{comment} in the preamble – information_interchange Jun 7 '18 at 2:16
  • an example of the use of each of these would be good for this answer as it comes up in google – baxx Apr 29 at 14:18

You can use \iffalse:

One morning, as Gregor Samsa was waking up from anxious dreams, he discovered
that in his bed he had been changed into a monstrous verminous bug. He lay on
his armour-hard back and saw, as he lifted his head up a little, his brown,
arched abdomen divided up into rigid bow-like sections.

Of course, this has to align with other syntactical TeX structures in you document whereas you can use % much more freely. The good news is that you can introduce your own switch to make this optional:

\drafttrue % or \draftfalse

<only shown in draft mode>
<only shown in non-draft mode>

The \else part is optional and you could use \ifdraft ... \fi if you don't need it.

  • 28
    I'm sorry to say, but I saw a bug in your code! :) – McGafter Mar 31 '14 at 13:26

The verbatim package provides a comment environment:

    This text will be displayed
    This text will not be displayed.

The Not So Short Introduction to LaTeX2e mentions this option on page 6 and remarks: "Note that this won’t work inside complex environments, like math for example."


Another option is the comment package, which, like verbatim provides a comment environment, but offers the option to define arbitrary "throw away" environments that can selectively be enabled or disabled:


% uncomment to include stuff in standard comment-environment

% define a mysection env which content is excluded

    This text will be displayed
    This text will only be displayed, if \includecomment{comment} was given
    This text will only be displayed, if \includecomment{mysection} was given

Additionally, the package provides some simple hooks into the defined environments. Instead of \includecomment{mysection} one could also use \specialcomment{mysection}{<before code>}{<after code>} to enable a comment section:

% typeset stuff in mycomment with gray text

There are other ways to solve this problem than via (La)TeX.

Something that is good about either of these solutions is that they are independent of particular LaTeX packages and code.

  • 3
    I'd second this; Most text editors have this, and emacs is great for when I'm writing lots of math. For more text-based things, TeXStudio is also good, and has a similar feature. – Canageek Jul 3 '12 at 23:03
  • 3
    Actually, <kbd>M-;</kbd> is even better (less keystrokes), and more intelligent (it does different things depending on e.g. whether region is active or not). – mbork Mar 23 '13 at 22:05
  • 1
    Worth noting, though, that my editor (Vim with LaTeX-Suite) is the reason I looked for this question despite already knowing how to line-comment en masse, because it screws up the folding. When I use the comment environment, I can fold up the whole commented-out part and only that part. – Luke Maurer Jun 30 '13 at 14:25
  • 1
    Also, uncommenting lines commented this way doesn't always work even in editors which support it in theory. It is however pretty useful. – Chris H Mar 31 '14 at 13:29
  • To supplement this answer: In TeXstudio it's Ctrl-T / Ctrl-U to comment and uncomment respectively. – A Boschman Sep 29 '16 at 12:11

I often paste in plain text such as writing guidelines and comment them out. For me the simplest way is to define a command with an argument which produces no output.


And to comment out text:

Text text text
  • 1
    I'm using same method. Just a detail, in the first code there's a missing backslash. It should be \newcommand{\comm}[1]{} (can't edit it, b/c of silly 6 characters rule). – monnef Jan 14 '15 at 9:02

In vi or vim you could comment a section (say line 102-345) like this:

[esc] [:]

you are in command mode now! And type:


it means substitute the beginning of the line (^) with a % sign.

  • 7
    I find much more easy to use block-visual-mode insert: notfaq.wordpress.com/2006/07/28/vim-comment-blocks-of-code – Rmano Apr 10 '14 at 20:57
  • The second command inserts % in front of the lines 102 till 345... Note that this does not check if the line is already a comment. – m13r Dec 6 '16 at 10:44
  • 1
    Usually you DO NOT want to check if the line is already commented, because you can later do 102,345s/^%// and leave any previously commented line commented. – gboffi Mar 13 '18 at 9:13

This answer obviously depents of the frontend one is using, but in the case of using Kile:

Commenting multiple lines with Kile

1) Select the lines you wish to comment out

2) Ctrl - D

Uncommenting multiple lines with Kile

1) Select the lines you wish uncomment

2) Ctrl - Shift - D

These shortcuts can be changed from Settings -> Configure Shortcuts...


Anything written after \end{document} will be ignored by the compiler. I often use this to cut a document short when troubleshooting, by inserting a second \end{document} at the appropriate place.

  • +1: Of course this only works if the section to comment out is from some line x to the end of the document. But if that is the case, this is easy and effective! I frequently use the area after \end{document} to keep larger chunks of "material I do not want to delete, yet" – Daniel Jun 8 '17 at 20:27

For the sake of completeness, I will include the shortcuts for comments on Texmaker (as previously answered in this thread). In short, Ctrl + T to comment and Ctrl + U to uncomment, but of course you can customize them.


If using TeXNiC Center: highlight the text. press ctrl + Q to comment the text out. ctrl + W will uncomment it.


Is there way to comment out a large section without having to manually putting a % in front of each line?

Not probably what you are looking for, but another approach to easily hide sections is work with child files. It is a rather simple process. Assuming commons usual shortcuts of commons editors (i.e, excluding vim/emacs) will be some like that:

  1. Select the section to comment
  2. Crtl-X (cut)
  3. Write %\input{filename}
  4. Crtl-N (new document)
  5. Crtl-V (paste)
  6. Crtl-S filename.tex (save the new document).

    Et voilá. Hereafter restore or comment the section again is as simple as remove/add one % before \input. Bonus points: (a)The commented part barely can bothers you while working in the main document and (b) prevent you of accidental deletions on the commented parts (that obviously cannot be detected in the pdf).

protected by Stefan Kottwitz Nov 1 '15 at 22:12

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.