Better automatic spacing of differential d?

Question

This question was basically about whether the differential d should be upright or italicized, not about how to achieve that in tex. However, this useful answer did suggest something like the following for typesetting it:

\newcommand{\der}{\operatorname{d\!}}

This is what I've been doing for a while, but I find that there are a few cases where the spacing is wrong. This code

\der(x^7) \quad \der x \quad \operatorname{d} (x^7) \quad \operatorname{d} x

gives output that looks like this:

The negative thin space looks good for typesetting dx, but bad for d(x^7). Is there a good way to define a single \der macro that automagically gets both cases right, or is my best option to define two macros and pick one or the other as needed?

Answer 1

\operatorname turns d into an operator. If an ordinary math atom follows (x), then TeX sets a thin space that is negated by \!. However, TeX does not set a space after an operator if the following math atom belongs to categories "open", "close", "punct", or "inner" (\scriptstyle/\scriptscriptstyle). A fix would be to add an empty math ord atom (\mathord{} or an empty sub formula {}), then TeX always sets a thin space, canceled by \!. Macro \der behaves on the left-hand side as an operator and on its right-hand side as an ordinary math atom. Now both cases work as expected:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\newcommand{\der}{\operatorname{d\!}{}}
\begin{document}
\[
  \der(x^7) \quad \der x
\]
\end{document}

Variation

The d can be put both in the operator atom or the ordinary atom, as suggested in the comment of Manuel and the comment of egreg (without \mathrm):

\mathop{}\!\mathrm{d}

Fonts for d

• \lim, \sin and friends are using the font \operator@font. Package amsmath then provides macro \operatorname. But the former can also be used without an additional package:

  \makeatletter
  \newcommand*{\der}{%
    \mathop{\kern\z@\operator@font d}\!{}%
  }
  \makeatother
  

  \kern\z@ prevents that \mathop centers the symbol.

  Or with d in the ordinary atom:

  \makeatletter
  \newcommand*{\der}{%
    \mathop{}\!{\operator@font d}%
  }
  \makeatother
  

• Font \mathrm is easier to use (no @ in the name):

  \newcommand*{\der}{%
    \mathop{}\!\mathrm{d}%
  }
  

  or a little more complex, again the \kern prevents vertical centering:

  \newcommand*{\der}{%
    \mathop{\kern0pt\mathrm{d}}\!{}%
  }
  

• The italics variant:

  \newcommand*{\der}{%
    \mathop{}\!d%
  }%
  

  or

  \newcommand*{\der}{%
    \mathop{\kern0pt d}\!{}%
  }
  

  

Answer 2

Packages are written by good and nice people keeping lazy and ignorant people like me in mind. Instead of re-inventing things, it is better start finding a suitable package and use it. In this case, physics package (as noted by Johannes) offers \dd macro. A screen shot of the relevant part of the physics documentation:

And a sample code:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{physics}
\begin{document}
  \[
  \dd(x^7) \quad \dd x
  \]
\end{document}