4

I am trying to left-justify a split equation. I would like to have the first line left-justified, and have a hanging indent on the second line. I used flalign successfully for other equations that weren't split, but this split equation is causing me problems. Any suggestions are much appreciated!

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\begin{flalign}
\begin{split}
\Lambda^{12}_{ee}&=\Lambda^{21}_{ee}=\frac{64x_e}{75k_B}\sqrt{\frac{m_e}{2\pi k_BT_e}}\left[\sum_{j\in\set{H}}x_j\left(\frac{175}{16}\Omega^{(1,1)}_{ej}-\frac{315}{8}\Omega^{(1,2)}_{ej}+57\Omega^{(1,3)}_{ej} -30\Omega^{(1,4)}_{ej} \right)\right. \\ 
&\left.+x_e\sqrt{2}\left(\frac{7}{4}\Omega^{(2,2)}_{ee}-2\Omega^{(2,3)}_{ee}\right)\right] 
\end{split}
\end{flalign}

\end{document}
  • Welcome to TeX.SX! A tip: If you indent lines by 4 spaces, they'll be marked as a code sample. You can also highlight the code and click the "code" button (with "{}" on it). – egreg Jun 19 '14 at 14:13
  • Might also be an idea to post something that actually compiles, what is \set? – daleif Jun 19 '14 at 14:27
1

I'm not sure to understand what you mean by “left aligning”; either you left align or center all equations.

For the specific case, the formula is really difficult to split sensibly, so I propose a different strategy:

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}

\newcommand{\set}[1]{#1}%??? The definition was missing

\begin{document}
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
\Lambda^{12}_{ee}&=
  \Lambda^{21}_{ee}=\frac{64x_e}{75k_B}\sqrt{\frac{m_e}{2\pi k_BT_e}}\,
  \biggl(\,\sum_{j\in\set{H}}x_jA_{ej}+x_e\sqrt{2}\,B_{e}\biggr)\\
A_{ej}&=\frac{175}{16}\Omega^{(1,1)}_{ej}-
        \frac{315}{8}\Omega^{(1,2)}_{ej}+
        57\Omega^{(1,3)}_{ej}-
        30\Omega^{(1,4)}_{ej} \\[1ex]
B_{e}&=\frac{7}{4}\Omega^{(2,2)}_{ee}-2\Omega^{(2,3)}_{ee}
\end{split}
\end{equation}

\end{document}

enter image description here

1

If you have the space for it (width) then I'd just use

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\let\set\mathbb
\begin{document}
\begin{equation*}
  \Lambda^{12}_{ee}=\Lambda^{21}_{ee}=\frac{64x_e}{75k_B}\sqrt{\frac{m_e}{2\pi
      k_BT_e}}\biggl[
  \!
  \begin{aligned}[t]
    &\sum_{j\in\set{H}}x_j\left(\frac{175}{16}\Omega^{(1,1)}_{ej}-\frac{315}{8}\Omega^{(1,2)}_{ej}+57\Omega^{(1,3)}_{ej}
      -30\Omega^{(1,4)}_{ej} \right)
    \\
    &+x_e\sqrt{2}\left(\frac{7}{4}\Omega^{(2,2)}_{ee}-2\Omega^{(2,3)}_{ee}\right)\biggr]
  \end{aligned}
\end{equation*}

\end{document}
  • But @egregs solution is better. – daleif Jun 19 '14 at 14:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.