4

I am working with the first of 3 very long equations and am trying to get it where it will be relatively easy to read. However I get the following error

! Missing } inserted.
<inserted text> 
                }
l.95 \end{multline}

If I use equation instead of multline the code works, but then it is not readable since it is such a long expression. Can anyone help me figure this out?

\documentclass[12]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
 \begin{document}
\begin{multline}
\dot{u}= \frac{R^2\, X_a + R^2\, X_t \\
+R_{earth}^2\, T_{13}\, g_0\, m \\
-R^2\, m\, q\, \omega \\
+R^2\, m\, r\, v \\
-R^3\, T_{13}\, T_{21}^2\, m\, \omega_{earth}^2\, \cos^2\lambda \\
-R^3\, T_{13}\, T_{31}^2\, m\, \omega_{earth}^2\, \cos^2\lambda \\
+R^2\, T_{31}\, m\, v\, \omega_{earth}\, \cos\lambda \\
-R^2\, T_{21}\, m\, \omega\, \omega_{earth}\, \cos\lambda \\
-\frac{R^3\, T_{11}\, T_{23}^2\, m\, \omega_{earth}^2\, \sin(2\lambda)}{2} \\
-\frac{R^3\, T_{11}\, T_{33}^2\, m\, \omega_{earth}^2\,\sin(2\lambda)}{2} \\
-R^2\, T_{33}\, m\, v\, \omega_{earth}\, \sin\lambda  \\
+R^2\, T_{23}\, m\, \omega\, \omega_{earth}\, \sin\lambda  \\
+R^3\, T_{11}\, T_{21}\, T_{23}\, m\, \omega_{earth}^2\, \cos^2\lambda \\
+R^3\, T_{11}\, T_{31}\, T_{33}\, m\, \omega_{earth}^2\, \cos^2\lambda \\
+\frac{R^3\, T_{13}\, T_{21}\, T_{23}\, m\, \omega_{earth}^2\, \sin(2\lambda)}{2} \\
+\frac{R^3\, T_{13}\, T_{31}\, T_{33}\, m\, \omega_{earth}^2\, \sin(2\lambda)}{2}}{R^2 \, m}
\end{multline}
\end{document}

Edit: Thanks for all the help. Can you explain why the usage of \, is incorrect? I was under the impression that it would provide a narrow space between two adjacent symbols.

  • Unrelated to the problem but never use math italic for multi-letter identifiers \omega_{earth} should be \omega_{\mathrm{earth}} or \omega_{\mathit{earth}} – David Carlisle Jun 27 '14 at 16:05
  • why all the \, ? – David Carlisle Jun 27 '14 at 16:14
4

You can't split lines in the middle of the numerator. I suggest you to use a different approach, since the denominator is quite short:

\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}

\begin{document}
\begin{multline}
\dot{u}=\frac{1}{R^2m}\Bigl(
  R^2 X_a + R^2 X_t 
  +R_{\mathrm{earth}}^2 T_{13} g_0 m 
  -R^2 m q \omega 
  +R^2 m r v
\\
  -R^3 T_{13} T_{21}^2 m \omega_{\mathrm{earth}}^2 \cos^2\lambda
  -R^3 T_{13} T_{31}^2 m \omega_{\mathrm{earth}}^2 \cos^2\lambda
\\
  +R^2 T_{31} m v \omega_{\mathrm{earth}} \cos\lambda
  -R^2 T_{21} m \omega \omega_{\mathrm{earth}} \cos\lambda
\\
  -\tfrac{1}{2}R^3 T_{11} T_{23}^2 m \omega_{\mathrm{earth}}^2 \sin(2\lambda)
  -\tfrac{1}{2}R^3 T_{11} T_{33}^2 m \omega_{\mathrm{earth}}^2\sin(2\lambda)
\\
  -R^2 T_{33} m v \omega_{\mathrm{earth}} \sin\lambda
  +R^2 T_{23} m \omega \omega_{\mathrm{earth}} \sin\lambda
\\
  +R^3 T_{11} T_{21} T_{23} m \omega_{\mathrm{earth}}^2 \cos^2\lambda
  +R^3 T_{11} T_{31} T_{33} m \omega_{\mathrm{earth}}^2 \cos^2\lambda
\\
  +\tfrac{1}{2}R^3 T_{13} T_{21} T_{23} m \omega_{\mathrm{earth}}^2 \sin(2\lambda)
  +\tfrac{1}{2}R^3 T_{13} T_{31} T_{33} m \omega_{\mathrm{earth}}^2 \sin(2\lambda)
\Bigr)
\end{multline}
\end{document}

Note that I removed all \, which are not required and are actually wrong. Also the “earth” subscripts have been rendered in upright type.

Also the inner fractions with denominator 2 have been rendered with 1/2 as coefficient.

enter image description here

| improve this answer | |
4

An alternate presentation may be more readable:

\documentclass[12]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\def\oea{\omega_\mathrm{earth}}
\begin{document}
\begin{equation}
\dot{u}= \frac{A+B+C+D+E+F}{R^2 \, m}
\end{equation}
where
\[
\begin{aligned}
A =& +R^2\, X_a + R^2\, X_t \\
&+R_{earth}^2\, T_{13}\, g_0\, m \\
&-R^2\, m\, q\, \omega \\
&+R^2\, m\, r\, v \\
&-R^3\, T_{13}\, T_{21}^2\, m\, \oea^2\, \cos^2\lambda \\
&-R^3\, T_{13}\, T_{31}^2\, m\, \oea^2\, \cos^2\lambda \\
&+R^2\, T_{31}\, m\, v\, \oea\, \cos\lambda \\
&-R^2\, T_{21}\, m\, \omega\, \oea\, \cos\lambda \\\\
B =& -\frac{R^3\, T_{11}\, T_{23}^2\, m\, \oea^2\, \sin(2\lambda)}{2} \\\\
C =& -\frac{R^3\, T_{11}\, T_{33}^2\, m\, \oea^2\,\sin(2\lambda)}{2} \\\\
D =&-R^2\, T_{33}\, m\, v\, \oea\, \sin\lambda  \\
&+R^2\, T_{23}\, m\, \omega\, \oea\, \sin\lambda  \\
&+R^3\, T_{11}\, T_{21}\, T_{23}\, m\, \oea^2\, \cos^2\lambda \\
&+R^3\, T_{11}\, T_{31}\, T_{33}\, m\, \oea^2\, \cos^2\lambda \\\\
E =& +\frac{R^3\, T_{13}\, T_{21}\, T_{23}\, m\, \oea^2\, \sin(2\lambda)}{2} \\\\
F =& +\frac{R^3\, T_{13}\, T_{31}\, T_{33}\, m\, \oea^2\, \sin(2\lambda)}{2}
\end{aligned}
\]
\end{document}

enter image description here

| improve this answer | |
2

This produces a multiline expression in the numerator but the result isn't really readable, it would be better to restructure the formula and perhaps name some subterms

\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
 \begin{document}
\newcommand\omea{\omega_{\mathrm{earth}}}
\begin{equation}
\dot{u}= \frac{
\begin{aligned}R^2\, X_a + R^2\, X_t \\
+R_{earth}^2\, T_{13}\, g_0\, m \\
-R^2\, m\, q\, \omega \\
+R^2\, m\, r\, v \\
-R^3\, T_{13}\, T_{21}^2\, m\, \omea^2\, \cos^2\lambda \\
-R^3\, T_{13}\, T_{31}^2\, m\, \omea^2\, \cos^2\lambda \\
+R^2\, T_{31}\, m\, v\, \omea\, \cos\lambda \\
-R^2\, T_{21}\, m\, \omega\, \omea\, \cos\lambda \\
-\frac{R^3\, T_{11}\, T_{23}^2\, m\, \omea^2\, \sin(2\lambda)}{2} \\
-\frac{R^3\, T_{11}\, T_{33}^2\, m\, \omea^2\,\sin(2\lambda)}{2} \\
-R^2\, T_{33}\, m\, v\, \omea\, \sin\lambda  \\
+R^2\, T_{23}\, m\, \omega\, \omea\, \sin\lambda  \\
+R^3\, T_{11}\, T_{21}\, T_{23}\, m\, \omea^2\, \cos^2\lambda \\
+R^3\, T_{11}\, T_{31}\, T_{33}\, m\, \omea^2\, \cos^2\lambda \\
+\frac{R^3\, T_{13}\, T_{21}\, T_{23}\, m\, \omea^2\, \sin(2\lambda)}{2} \\
+\frac{R^3\, T_{13}\, T_{31}\, T_{33}\, m\, \omea^2\, \sin(2\lambda)}{2}
\end{aligned}}{R^2 \, m}
\end{equation}
\end{document}

enter image description here

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.