I've been just reading through this Latex wikibook and I spotted they advocate use of \subfloat
in figures. I've always used \subfigure
.
What is the difference?
2 Answers
\subfigure
belongs to the obsolete package with the name subfigure
. It's still supported in the newer subfig
package because of backward compatibility. I recommend to use \subfloat
.
subfig
should be preferref to subfigure
, that's why the command \subfigure
is not needed. Though it's available if you load the configuration altsf.cfg
. It defines simply
\@ifundefined{c@subfigure}{\newsubfloat{figure}}{}
\def\subfigure{\subfloat}
\@ifundefined{c@subtable}{\newsubfloat{table}}{}
\def\subtable{\subfloat}
and further options for captions.
-
I remember seeing some discussion about subfigure not being obsolete and
subfig
no maintainer. Anyone has further details on this?– Leo LiuAug 18, 2010 at 18:17 -
-
@Leo: From the abstract of the subfig documentation: "The
subfig
package ... replaces the oldersubfigure
package."– TH.Feb 28, 2011 at 18:18
Note that you might prefer subfig
to subfloat
if wanting to use tocloft
(*) to configure your TOC, LOF and LOT look and feel.
In which case, for example,
\@ifpackageloaded{subfig}
{\usepackage[subfigure,...]{tocloft}}
{\usepackage[...]{tocloft}}
\renewcommand{\cftchappresnum}{...}
...
\@ifpackageloaded{subfig}{\renewcommand{\cftsubfigpresnum}{...}}{}
...
\renewcommand{\cftchappagefont}{...}
...
\@ifpackageloaded{subfig}{\renewcommand{\cftsubfigpagefont}{...}}{}
(*) I'm sure tocloft
's Current Maintainer could provide the canonicals should anyone want to ask.
-
Err, just because I'm the maintainer doesn't mean I always know stuff like this
:)
I took over the package for continuity, not because I know its internals inside out! Aug 20, 2010 at 15:41 -