3

I am trying to get stacked indices using subarray/substack using the following snippet, but I am not seeing stacking beneath the sum symbol. This is the type of output I am expecting, good output

but this is what I am getting:

bad output

Here is the code:

\documentclass{report}
\usepackage{amsmath, amsfonts, amssymb}
\begin{document}
    \[
          \frac{\sum_{\begin{subarray}{l}\forall x \\
          \mathcal{D}(x)=\mathcal{D}_i\end{subarray}} \sum_{\substack{\forall
              y\in\Omega(x) \\
   \mathcal{D}(y)=\mathcal{D}_j}} 1}
    {\sum_{\forall x }\mathcal{D}(x)}
   \]
\end{document}

What should I do to get proper stacking?

2
  • 2
    So you are after output that resembles this? Issue \displaystyle in the numerator and denominator of \frac.
    – Werner
    Aug 25 '14 at 17:39
  • @werner, thanks. wish it's possible to accept a solution in a comment too :)
    – Jey
    Aug 25 '14 at 18:16
4

You need to add the directive \displaystyle at the start of both the numerator and denominator. I would also add \, (thinspace) between the two main terms in the numerator.

enter image description here

\documentclass{report}
\usepackage{amsmath, amsfonts, amssymb}
\begin{document}
\[
   \frac{\displaystyle\sum_{\begin{subarray}{l}\forall x \\
                             \mathcal{D}(x)=\mathcal{D}_i\end{subarray}}  \, 
      \sum_{\substack{\forall y\in\Omega(x) \\ \mathcal{D}(y)=\mathcal{D}_j}} 1}
   {\displaystyle\sum_{\forall x }\mathcal{D}(x)}
\]
\end{document}

For more on this subject, you may want to consult the posting Fractions with large elements.

1
  • Or \limits, but perhaps in this case \displaystyle is better.
    – egreg
    Aug 25 '14 at 18:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.