In the example
$\cup^{i=1}_{\infty}F_i$
How do you get the i=1
directly below the union symbol and the infinity directly above?
TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for users of TeX, LaTeX, ConTeXt, and related typesetting systems. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityThe correct command to use in this case is \bigcup
; you could go with
$\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{\infty} F_{i}$
but this will irremediably spoil your document. When a formula is inline, it's better if limits are set to the side of the symbol. In display math mode the \limits
is implicit. See the following example and judge for yourself.
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
The correct command to use in this case is \verb|\bigcup|;
if you use \verb|\limits| your formula will appear inline
like $\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{\infty} F_{i}$, but this will
irremediably spoil your document. When a formula is inline,
it's better if limits are set to the side of the symbol. In
display math mode the \verb|\limits| is implicit. Here is the
same formula without it $\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} F_{i}$ and you
can clearly see that the vertical spacing is much better.
In a display there is no problem
\[
\bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty} F_{i}
\]
and the limits can be set above and below without spoiling
the spacing, which is an important factor when readability
is considered.
\end{document}
\bigcup\nolimits
does it. You can do it globally for all big operators by passing the nosumlimits
option to amsmath
.
\bigcup
is used for “indexed union”; for the binary operation, use \cup
.
$\bigcup\limits_{i=1}^{\infty} F_{i}$
, but in inline math mode it's better to set the limits on the side (just don't use\limits
, which is implicit in display math mode). Note that MathJax is not used on this site, because we don't want the code to become an approximation of the result, but want to talk about the code itself.