11

This question already has an answer here:

I have a nested fraction on the right-hand side of an equation. I use the LaTeX code as follows to produce the equation:

\begin{equation}
\frac{1}{T_{ex}} = \frac{\frac{1}{T_{kin}}+\left(\frac{A_{ul}}{C_{ul}}        
\frac{T_{cmb}}{T_*}\right)\frac{1}{T_{cmb}}}{1+\frac{A_{ul}}{C_{ul}}    
\frac{T_{cmb}}{T_*}}.
\end{equation}

However, the fractions in the denominator and numerator of the main fraction appear too small on a regular A4 page. How can I make them larger while preserving the size of text on the left-hand side.

marked as duplicate by Mico, Masroor, Claudio Fiandrino, Jesse, egreg Oct 22 '14 at 7:30

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 2
    Use \cfrac (continued fraction) – Sean Allred Oct 22 '14 at 4:21
  • You also can use \mfrac from the nccmath packade (medium-size fractions, ~ 80 % of \displaystyle) for the nested fractions. Sometimes it looks better. – Bernard Oct 22 '14 at 9:52
16

(I swear this must be a duplicate question, but I can't find one.)

Read the comments below for why you might want to use a single \displaystyle instead of my answer below.

Use \cfrac: (Also, use \text{…} for math elements that are interpreted as text, such as \lim_{t\to\infty}C_{\text{Gasoline}=\infty})

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\begin{equation}
\cfrac{1}{T_{\text{ex}}} = \cfrac{\cfrac{1}{T_{\text{kin}}}+\left(\cfrac{A_{\text{ul}}}{C_{\text{ul}}}
\cfrac{T_{\text{cmb}}}{T_*}\right)\cfrac{1}{T_{\text{cmb}}}}{1+\cfrac{A_{\text{ul}}}{C_{\text{ul}}}
\cfrac{T_{\text{cmb}}}{T_*}}.
\end{equation}
\end{document}

enter image description here

  • I found an earlier, related posting... – Mico Oct 22 '14 at 5:18
  • @Mico can you link it here ? The question may still be duped. – Sean Allred Oct 22 '14 at 12:27
  • The earlier posting's title is Fractions with large elements. Personally, I think it's better to provide a \displaystyle declaration at the start of the numerator and denominator material than to employ a multitude of \cfrac directives. – Mico Oct 22 '14 at 13:33
  • @Mico Why would you say? I would use \cfrac, not only because it is less typing, but because (to me) it seems much more descriptive of the actual mathematics. Is there a disadvantage to using \cfrac that I'm as-of-yet ignorant of? – Sean Allred Oct 22 '14 at 13:43
  • @Mico Also, I didn't realize the question had already been duped -- you sacrifice a bit when you use the mobile app :) Reading the duped-answer makes a lot of sense now. – Sean Allred Oct 22 '14 at 13:44

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.