0

I'm wondering about dividing the page in 2 independent parts. I did it with minipage : first was \begin{minipage}{0.49\textwidth} .. \end{minipage} and second was \begin{minipage}{0.49\textwidth} ... \end{minipage} . This works but is there some way to equally divide it without specifying width ? I'm intending to use \usepackage[margin=.5in]{geometry} and would like that TeX divide it on equal parts.

edit: I have another problem. Putting box around column is breaking 2 columns.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{paracol}
\usepackage{kantlipsum}
\usepackage{framed}
\usepackage[margin=.5in]{geometry}
\begin{document}
\begin{framed}
  \begin{paracol}{2}
  \kant[1-2]
  \kant[1-2]
  \kant[1-2]
  \switchcolumn
  \kant[3-4]
  \end{paracol}
\end{framed}
\end{document}
  • 1
    There are lots of ways to set up two equally wide columns of text. How is LaTeX supposed to know how wide you want the columns to be? Separately, have you looked into setting the option twocolumn when executing the \documentclass instruction? – Mico Mar 9 '15 at 6:36
  • twocolumn doesn't set independent columns – vejn Mar 9 '15 at 7:05
  • See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/32154/… – JPi Mar 9 '15 at 7:27
  • Please be specific about what you mean by "independent columns." – Mico Mar 9 '15 at 7:33
  • When writing on the end of first column, doesn't continue in second column but on 1 column on second page. – vejn Mar 9 '15 at 15:02
3

There are many ways of doing it.

A sample with paracol

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{paracol}
\usepackage{kantlipsum}
\usepackage[margin=.5in]{geometry}
\begin{document}
  \begin{paracol}{2}
  \kant[1-2]
  \switchcolumn
  \kant[3-4]
  \end{paracol}
\end{document}

enter image description here

With parcolumns:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{parcolumns}
\usepackage{kantlipsum}
\usepackage[margin=.5in]{geometry}

\begin{document}
        \begin{parcolumns}{2}            
            \colchunk{ %
                \kant[1-2]
            }
            \colchunk{ %
                \kant[3-4]
            }
            \colplacechunks
        \end{parcolumns}
\end{document}

Output same as above.

With `parallel:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{parallel}
\usepackage{kantlipsum}
\usepackage[margin=.5in]{geometry}

\begin{document}
  \begin{Parallel}[v]{0.49\textwidth}{0.49\textwidth}
    \ParallelLText{\kant[1-2]} 
    \ParallelRText{\kant[3-4]} 
    \ParallelPar
  \end{Parallel}
\end{document}

enter image description here

And the brute force:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{kantlipsum}
\usepackage[margin=.5in]{geometry}

\begin{document}
  \noindent
  \begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{@{}XX@{}}
    \kant[1-2] &  \kant[3-4]
  \end{tabularx}
\end{document}

Figure same as first one.

  • Thx, with Parallel why did you put 0.49 width? – vejn Mar 9 '15 at 15:05
  • @vejn Just to accommodate the vertical line. – user11232 Mar 9 '15 at 15:16
  • Which method is best to use for math article, equations and images? – vejn Mar 9 '15 at 15:31
  • @vejn paracol is neater. parcolumns and parallel may also be used. – user11232 Mar 9 '15 at 15:43
  • 1
    @vejn Instead of editing the question, you should ask a new one with all the details. You didn't specify that you need a box. You may use tabularx solution then. – user11232 Mar 9 '15 at 23:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.