1

I'm testing a well-formatted bib file with a single entry,

@misc{various_authors_main_2015,
    title = {Main {Page}},
    copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License},
    url = {https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=647785249},
    language = {en},
    urldate = {2015-03-16},
    journal = {Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia},
    author = {{Various authors}},
    month = feb,
    year = {2015},
    note = {Page Version ID: 647785249}
}

using the various styles available from texlive-publishers and texlive-bibtex-extra.

I have two issues (I did Tools->Reconfigure, and restarted before testing):

  1. Not all of the newly installed styles appear in LyX.
  2. Many styles generate errors (repeating messages are about missing/extra/forgotten $ and }).

Using \usepackage{hyperref} (reported here) fixes the problem for some styles, but not all.

(Related question: Some styles work in Lyx's BibTeX Generated Bibliography, others don't)

Sample error messages

xplain

 \authorindexentries
                       {various_authors_main_2015}{\do{Various authors@{Various
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.

IEEEtranM

 ...requires the use of the mciteplus package.}
                                                  \fi
This bibstyle requires the use of the mciteplus package.

However, it is installed under the texlive-latex-extra umbrella.

unsrtnat

 ...index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=647785249}
                                                  .
I've inserted a begin-math/end-math symbol since I think
you left one out. Proceed, with fingers crossed.
8
  • This might not be a LyX thing. Different styles provide different pitfalls. Try it with usual LaTeX, you will get the same problems.
    – Johannes_B
    Mar 16, 2015 at 20:05
  • What's a field named journal doing in an entry of type @misc? I wouldn't go as far as calling this entry well-formatted.
    – Mico
    Mar 16, 2015 at 20:08
  • Doesn't the linked questions answer also answer this one? Where do you see differences?
    – Johannes_B
    Mar 16, 2015 at 20:08
  • @Johannes_B, I tried without ampersands and it didn't change anything.
    – Sparkler
    Mar 16, 2015 at 20:10
  • @Mico, I removed the journal entry and no change for the styles I tested.
    – Sparkler
    Mar 16, 2015 at 20:11

1 Answer 1

1

(summarizing the comments above)

This issue is not directly related to LyX, but rather to the individual styles.

Different styles provide different pitfalls.

Best practice would be formatting the BIB file in accordance with the style to be used.

Getting the bib cleaned up, maybe for a specific style, solves the issue.

However several best-practices are recommended:

  • Add \usepackage{hyperref} to the LaTeX preamble.
  • Specify URLs in the url field and not in the howpublished field.
  • Use escapes for special chracters such as underscore and ampersand.
  • Coordinate entries and fields. For example, journal shouldn't be a field in a misc entry.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .