When typing < or > in LaTeX and compiling with pdflatex, the less than and greater than symbols appear at upside down exclamation points. I'm not in math mode.


3 Answers 3


Geoffs tip with \textless and \textgreater will work well for you. However, you could type these symbols < and > directly in your editor and they would be correctly printed if you use the recommended font encoding, Cork resp. T1:


Have a look at the T1 encoding table, search for the symbols < and >. Afterwards, open the OT1 encoding table, which is the default. At the two corresponding places you will find the upside down exclamation resp. quotation mark. That should explain it.

For further reasons, why you should use T1 encoding, have a look at this question: Why should I use \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}?

You should use a font supporting T1. For instance use the very good Latin Modern font, derived from the standard fonts:


Or install the cm-super package which provides the standard Computer Modern fonts with T1 support.

  • 2
    Further reading: Latin Modern vs cm-super?
    – doncherry
    Jan 31, 2013 at 6:46
  • 2
    will this screw up any other part of the document?
    – Hao S
    Jun 13, 2016 at 20:52
  • 2
    @HaoSun It's an improvement. If something would change that you don't desire, it can be fixed. If you don't want any change, just don't change.
    – Stefan Kottwitz
    Jun 13, 2016 at 22:24
  • 1
    The link "T1 encoding table" is stale.
    – MetaEd
    Oct 21, 2022 at 19:32
  • Replaced the stale links with archive.org versions.
    – praseodym
    May 11, 2023 at 16:55

Use \textless and \textgreater.

  • 12
    unless they are part of a math expression, in which case they should be between dollar signs or \( ... \) along with the rest of the math expression. Aug 26, 2010 at 19:51

What I usually do is just enter mathmode to type them, e.g. This object is $<$ that object.

  • 22
    That is generally considered poor style. You should just write out "This object is less than that object." Occasionally, you'll see "foo is <0." This looks bad.
    – TH.
    Aug 27, 2010 at 23:32
  • 13
    That's definitely true. However, if you're using LaTeX to organize your thoughts (as i often do), 'good style' equates to 'will I understand what I wrote if I come back and look at it in a week'! Sep 3, 2010 at 3:30
  • @TH.: I agree with you. My experiency tells me too that text and math code should not be mixed up. Good style would be either writing "The variable $foo$ is less than zero." (as you mentioned) or "The variable $foo$ satisfies the relation/condition $foo<0$.", which would probably suit your application. Good style means also to define variables at the first use.
    – strpeter
    Dec 7, 2013 at 8:07
  • 1
    @strpeter While mentioning style, it is worth noting that variable $foo$ is not good style either: it refers to the product of $f$, $o$, and $o$. You mean variable $\mathit{foo}$.
    – akim
    Dec 8, 2014 at 9:19
  • OK, I was not typing it correct in the sense of the variable as I focused on the operator. You're right - use your preferred version $\mathit{foo}<0$, $\mathrm{foo}<0$, $\mathbf{foo}<0$, or whatever variable. ;)
    – strpeter
    Dec 8, 2014 at 10:40

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .