3

I have c. 80 pages of English text that naturally contains (in)definite articles. The text is block-aligned. The problem is that the article sometimes remains in the end of line and the noun starts on another.

Input 1:

The more you get the better you'll see.

Output 1: (the | character represents the end of line)

 The  more  you  get  the|
 better you'll see.      |

From my point of view this is extremely unreadable. Thus I'd like to prevent this behavior. One possible way of doing so is using ~ instead of spaces.

Input 2:

The~more you get the~better you'll see.

Output 2: (the | character represents the end of line)

 The    more    you   get|
 the better you'll see.  |

However, changing the whole text (the, a, an, in, of, ...) seems impossible - so many words. Question: Can I add something to the preamble in order to achieve ~ behavior implicitly? I mean is there any package that makes that even without explicit ~s?

  • 1
    Have you tried loading package microtype? That does a little bit of magic to your letters. – Johannes_B May 17 '15 at 7:25
  • @Johannes_B not really but I tried it right now... no visible change, probably it requires some specific options? I briefly read the package documentation but it doesn't seem to deal with my problem, does it? Could you provide some example please? – petrbel May 17 '15 at 7:33
  • 1
    I do believe that this is possible by some dirty hack (that probably has some caveats). But I would advise heavily against it! I personally think the breaking is readable and typographically preferable. – JBantje May 17 '15 at 7:37
  • 1
    I think i have misunderstood your question. I thought words were printing in the margin. In your example sentence, one would make a little pause when reading, but i don't think this is reason for hacking the typesetting. I would just leave it, to be honest. – Johannes_B May 17 '15 at 8:04
  • 3
    I'm a native English speaker and it would never occur to me to prevent a linebreak at that position, nor have I ever seen any suggestion that it should be avoided there. Is this applying the conventions of a different language to English? – David Carlisle May 17 '15 at 9:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.