1

I keep on getting the following error message when I attempt to compile my source code:

! Undefined control sequence

Before, I was unable to compile and saw another question that had been answered and added

\usepackage{etex}

to my code. Now, upon compiling I get the afforementioned undefined control sequence in reference to a

\delete

Here is a MWE:

\documentclass[a4paper,12pt,twoside]{book}
\usepackage{etex}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amscd,amsbsy,array,color,epsfig}

\usepackage{changes}

\begin{document}

\chapter{Logic, Set Theory, Functions, and Relations.}
\section{Mathematical Logic.}
\subsection{Introduction.}
\small{Analysis is all about the theory behind Calculus. In this course, we do not take for granted such notions as what the set $\mathbb{R}$ of real numbers is; rather we carefully define $\mathbb{R}$ by `building' it out of other sets - beginning with the set $\mathbb{N}$ of Natural Numbers. Numbers and number systems (i.e. $\mathbb{N}, \mathbb{Z}, \mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{R},$ and $\mathbbC}$) are the `building-blocks' of Analysis. Here in this book, we do not merely state the properties of the Real Number System, but we derive them. \\
However, \deleted[id=MD,remark=blah blah blah]{Would you like any toast?} before we do that (and we shall in Chapter 1), we first \delete[id=MD,remark=blah blah blah]{present}  this introductory chapter - Chapter 0 - in order to give the reader the tools needed to carry on this study of the branch of mathematics known as Analysis. Here, we present a `brief' review of Mathematical Logic, Set Theory, Functions, and Relations; and we `informally' define a few sets of which we shall make frequent use of in Analysis. All of them (or most of them) shall be dealt with more formally in the next chapter.}

\end{document}

I have left out many additional packages I used and since the error occurred so soon in the document I have only shown the first bit of the doc itself. Please forgive me as I have little experience with the changes package, but I thought I was loading it correctly and syntaxing it correctly as well.

Thanks, -MD

4

Your current document has the following errors or problems:

  1. \mathbbC} -> \mathbb{C};

  2. changes does not define \delete, only \deleted;

  3. You need to define the author/id MD as a "change author" before you can use it, so you need \definechangesauthor[<options>]{MD} after loading \usepackage{changes};

  4. It's not advised to use \\ for a paragraph break. Leave a blank line or issue an explicit \par. If you don't enjoy the indentation, see Turn off paragraph indention for a single line. Alternatively, \setlength{\parindent}{0pt} will remove all paragraph indentation in your document.

Here is a complete minimal example:

enter image description here

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amssymb,changes}
\definechangesauthor{MD}

\begin{document}

Analysis is all about the theory behind Calculus. In this course, we do not
take for granted such notions as what the set~$\mathbb{R}$ of real numbers 
is; rather we carefully define~$\mathbb{R}$ by `building' it out of other 
sets---beginning with the set~$\mathbb{N}$ of Natural Numbers. Numbers and 
number systems (\textit{i.e.\/}\ $\mathbb{N}$, $\mathbb{Z}$,
$\mathbb{Q}$,~$\mathbb{R}$ and~$\mathbb{C}$) are the `building-blocks' of 
Analysis. Here in this book, we do not merely state the properties of the 
Real Number System, but we derive them.

However, \deleted[id=MD,remark=blah blah blah]{Would you like any toast?} 
before we do that (and we shall in Chapter 1), we first 
\deleted[id=MD,remark=blah blah blah]{present} this introductory 
chapter---Chapter~0---in order to give the reader the tools needed to carry 
on this study of the branch of mathematics known as Analysis. Here, we 
present a `brief' review of Mathematical Logic, Set Theory, Functions, and 
Relations; and we `informally' define a few sets of which we shall make 
frequent use of in Analysis. All of them (or most of them) shall be dealt 
with more formally in the next chapter.

\end{document}
1
  • Thank you Werner for the complete MWE and the thorough answer!!! I neglected to open my curly brace on the set of complex numbers (I was editing my short-hand code to return it to standard latex code, sorry) and I also (though I had it in my full doc) neglected to define the author. Thanks again! – Michael Dykes May 25 '15 at 8:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.