2

When I print my bibliography I literally see (nodate) in my source when there's no date for an online bibtex entry. For example: Apple. (nodate). Introducing Swift. Verkregen 22 december 2014, van https://developer. apple.com/swift/

I wanna get rid of the (nodate), because the APA rules (dutch) say there should be (g.d.) instead of (nodate).

I'm using biblatex with the APA style. When I use the english-apa as LanguageMapping, I correctly see (n.d.) in the bibliography. The problem is only happening when I use dutch-apa. When I use a \parencite{} command, the correct date (g.d.) shows up, the problem only occurs at the \printbibliography.

How can I override the string they use when there's no date? I already tried playing around with this line of code, but it doesn't change anything: \DefineBibliographyStrings{dutch}{% nodate = {g.d.} }

MWE:

\documentclass[pdftex,a4paper,12pt,twoside]{report} 
\usepackage[dutch]{babel} 
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} 
\usepackage[style=apa]{biblatex} 
\DeclareLanguageMapping{dutch}{dutch-apa} 

\addbibresource{sources.bib} 
\begin{document} 

\parencite{introducingswift} 
\printbibliography 

\end{document}

with the following code in the sources.bib file:

@online{introducingswift,
    title = {Introducing {S}wift},
    author = {Apple},
    url = {https://developer.apple.com/swift/},
    urldate = {2014-12-22},
}

closed as off-topic by lockstep, moewe, LaRiFaRi, Svend Tveskæg, Paul Gessler May 25 '15 at 21:50

  • This question does not fall within the scope of TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems as defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    Can you show a minimal example that demonstrates the problem? I can't reproduce it. – Alan Munn May 25 '15 at 19:50
  • 1
    Welcome to TeX.SX! Even though the idea of your question is quite clear (at least I think I got it), your question would benefit from a MWE. Just so we have something to play around with and so we can actually see the problem. When I just wrote my own short example document based on what was my best guess for your document, I got "g.d." in the citations as well as the bibliography. – moewe May 25 '15 at 19:55
  • 1
    Is the "nodate" in bold (that would indicate the nodate string does not exist for some reason, in that case there would also be a warning in the .log)? Is it in two words or with a space in between? What version of biblatex are you using? – moewe May 25 '15 at 19:56
  • 1
    Alright, updating my distribution fixed the problem :) Thanks alot for helping me out! Too bad I can't mark your comment as answer yet. Maybe you can add an answer so I can approve it? – Jelle Elaut May 25 '15 at 20:45
  • 5
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because the problem was fixed by updating the OP's TeX distribution. – lockstep May 25 '15 at 20:46

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.