3

The cross-platform package manager pkgsrc includes a ConTeXt package, http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/pkgsrc/current/pkgsrc/print/tex-context/README.html

Has anyone used this successfully? I have separately installed ConTeXt minimals and pkgsrc on the same computer, but I've only been able to compile ConTeXt documents with ConTeXt minimals. [Lua|PDF|Xe]LaTeX is functional in pkgsrc.

Edit
Newer versions of pkgsrc have fixed the problem. They put a working context executable in the pkgsrc-managed bin directory and everything else in the pkgsrc-managed share/texmf-dist directory.

  • What happens when you compile a document using context from pgksrc? – Aditya Jun 4 '15 at 12:37
  • The package does not include a "context" executable script in the usual directory in the system $PATH (typically /usr/pkg/bin for a pkgsrc-based system), so the obvious guess is the file /usr/pkg/share/texmf-dist/scripts/context/stubs/unix/context, which seems to be a shell script. Running this (with /bin/sh) results in complaints about mtxrun not being found, but adding the directory (/usr/pkg/share/texmf-dist/scripts/context/stubs/unix) to $PATH results in complaints about mtxrun not being executable. Perhaps just a permissions error (+ lack of a /usr/pkg/bin/context script). – user31316 Jun 4 '15 at 21:39
  • 1
    context is just a wrapper around mtxrun and mtxrun needs to be executable in order for the rest of the machinery to work. All the stubs from .../stubs/unix should be executable and in $PATH. – Aditya Jun 4 '15 at 22:00
  • Are there any news here? – TeXnician Mar 3 at 13:15
  • Yes. More recent versions of pkgsrc do include a context executable, and it seems work properly (true for pkgsrc-2017Q4). – user31316 Mar 3 at 13:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy