# One coordinate a function, the other a Brownian Motion

I am new with Tikz and I have a question which I did not manage to solve looking at other posts. I was wondering how to draw a figure in 2D, in which the first component (the x) is a function of x itself, say for simplicity exp(x), while the second is another function of a 1D Brownian motion.

I found some good suggestions here on how to draw a 2D Brownian motion, but I could not do it on my own. I get stuck if I try to insert a function in the command {--++(rand*0.2,rand*0.2)}.

Do you have any idea? Thanks a lot in advance.

• Do you have the brown noise data already? – percusse Jun 3 '15 at 23:16
• I have an idea. Draw a 3D graphic: x axis for x variable, y axis for f(x) and z axis for Brownian motion, then you rotate the graphic to see 2D graphic: f(x) vs Brownian motion ... – juanuni Jun 4 '15 at 0:33

## 1 Answer

Like this?

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{calc}

\begin{document}

\begin{tikzpicture}

\draw[red] (0,0) \foreach \x in {1,...,300}{--++(0.03,{0.5*(floor(rand)*2.0+1.0)*sqrt(-ln(1-rand^2)/0.627)})};

\end{tikzpicture}

\end{document} • replace rand*0.2 with exp(rand*0.2) if you want exp of the Brownian motion. – JPi Jun 4 '15 at 1:04
• @percusse: No, I do not have any data at hand. @JPi: If I write \foreach \x in {1,...,300}{--++(0.03,exp(rand*0.2))};, then it gives this type of error: "Package tikz Error: Giving up on this path. Did you forget a semicolon?" But, in fact, the code is the same as you posted. Oh, but now I replaced exp(rand*0.2) with exp{rand*0.2} and now it seems to work. – user79476 Jun 4 '15 at 8:00
• @user79476 You should put {exp(rand*0.2)} instead of exp{rand*0.2}. Actually it surprises me that the latter even works. – Henri Menke Jun 4 '15 at 9:53
• @user79476 How is this a solution? It is the plot of the random variable from a uniform distribution [-1,1]. Is it OK if it looks random enough? What happened to the exp(x) and brown noise? – percusse Jun 4 '15 at 11:25
• Percusse is right; edited. New version gives an approximate Brownian motion. Take transformations of that as you please. – JPi Jun 4 '15 at 13:05