You could try the following:
\usepackage{bigfoot}
\usepackage{perpage}
\DeclareNewFootnote[para]{A}
\MakePerPage{footnoteA}
\expandafter\def\csname @makefnbreak\endcsname{\unskip\linebreak[0]}
\makeatletter
\let\@makefntext@orig\@makefntext
\FootnoteSpecific{A}\def\@makefntext#1{%
\noindent{\hbox{\textbf{\@thefnmark}\nolinebreak\ }}#1~\hss%
}
\makeatother
This will give you all the footnotes (to be inserted via footnoteA{...}
) as one continuous paragraph (first line not indented), bold footnotemarks and fixed spatia between the mark and the preceding and following text, respectively.
You can change the size of the whitespace by changing \nolinebreak\ }}#1~
to another horizontal space of your liking.
HTH, Dario
Edit: Added \MakePerPage
as per comment.
footmisc
produce such ugly results; they seem to result fromfrenchb
. Using\StandardFootnotes
improves the output considerably.frenchb
andfootmisc
are interacting and whether they can be made to cooperate better without stepping on French typographic conventions. But maybe there’s reason to depart from the conventions here: all those numbers at the foot of the page, from the note numbers and the verse numbers, are hard to read, especially when the note numbers aren’t superscripted; old-style numbers and theperpage
option offootmisc
may ease the strain somewhat.frenchb
's implementation is buggy though, with numbers getting far too close to each other.