4

I'm currently using biblatex and biber for my bibliography. While using bibstyle=alphabetic and citestyle=alphabetic generates the desired output, I want to edit the footcite format. As you might guess, at the moment it outputs something like this:

both styles alphabetic

I want to change the footcite format to be verbose. Setting citestyle=verbose solves the problem for the footnote but it also changes the citation in the text, what I don't want:

citestyle verbose

Is it possible to set bibstyle=alphabetic, citestyle=alphabetic and something like footcitestyle=verbose?

So the whole document should look like this (I used Photoshop in order to put this together):

desired output

How can I achieve this?

Here is a MWE:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}

\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@online{ford,
author = {Ford, Rebecca},
title  = {Earthquake: Twitter Users Learned of Tremors
          Seconds Before Feeling Them},
date   = {2011-08},
url    = {http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/earthquake-twitter-users-learned-tremors-226481}
}
\end{filecontents}

\usepackage[backend=biber, natbib=true, backref=true, citestyle=alphabetic, bibstyle=alphabetic, labeldate]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}

\begin{document}

It is true that \cite{ford} is wrong.

Citing in a footnote\footcite{ford} might be adventurous.

\printbibliography

\end{document}
  • 1
    I'm rather certain that it can be done somehow. But why do you want to confuse your readers by using two different reference systems? – Ulrike Fischer Jul 1 '15 at 10:31
  • Good argument. I think that citing with citestyle=verbose in my text confuses the readers because it's hard to read the whole sentence. However, citing with citestyle=alphabetic in a footnote doesn't give the information I would expect in that place. But yeah, there might be different arguments and all are valid. – sqe Jul 1 '15 at 10:34
  • But why do you use \cite in the text at all? \textcite would be okay. – Ulrike Fischer Jul 1 '15 at 10:43
  • 1
    Because you are mixing two citing methods. Why are some in the footnote but other not? – Ulrike Fischer Jul 1 '15 at 11:02
  • 2
    If you only want to use footnotes occasionally, just go with \footfullcite which should give a full citation in a footnote. – moewe Jul 1 '15 at 15:08
5

For the sporadic full footnote citation you will want to use \footfullcite, which will give a full citation in the footnote.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.