Initially, I had the code

|a_d|_p & = 1 \\
|a_i|_p & \leq 1

which produced the result below:

first image

This is undesirable because the vertical bars | on the left don't line up. Then I discovered the alignat environment, and tried the code

| & a_d & |_p & & & = 1 \\
| & a_i & |_p & & & \leq 1

which produced the result below:

second image

This is better, but it's still not great because now the a_d and a_i don't line up. Ideally, I'd want just the column with the a_d and a_i to be centered. Then, I looked at the answer to this question, and tried the code

| & \omit\hfill $a_d$ \hfill & |_p & & & = 1 \\
| & \omit\hfill $a_i$ \hfill & |_p & & & \leq 1

which produced the result below:

third image

This is better in some respects because each of the vertical bars line up, as do the a_d and a_i, but now the right-hand vertical bars |_p are spaced too far to the right. Any suggestions?

UPDATE: After reading the code in Bernard's suggestions, along with some information about \makemathbox (from mathtools), \newlength, and \settowidth, I came up with the following code, which seems to do what I want. However, am I doing anything that is deprecated?


|a_d|_p & = 1 \\
| \mathmakebox[\myl]{a_i} |_p & \leq 1
  • 2
    an experienced math copyeditor wouldn't find the original presentation inappropriate. i think this is a case of "trying too hard". – barbara beeton Jul 2 '15 at 18:09

Here are two solutions, using mathtools, and makebox for one of them. For the second one , with eqparbox , more automated. I define a \varpabs command which uses a tag: all \varpabs which share the same tag will have the same width – that of the widest argument:


\usepackage{makebox, eqparbox}
\DeclarePairedDelimiterXPP{\pabs}[1]{}\lvert \rvert{_p}{\ifblank{#1}{\:\cdot\:}{#1}}


  \pabs{a_d} & = 1 \\
  \pabs{\makebox*{$ a_d $}{$ a_i $}} & \leq 1

  \varpabs{A}{a_d + c} & = 1 \\
  \varpabs*{A}{ \frac{a_i }{b_i}} & \leq 1


enter image description here

| improve this answer | |
  • Also, how does the code I just added to the bottom of my question look? – justin Jul 3 '15 at 3:08
  • @justin You should read barbara's comment on your question: she knows whereof she speaks. (At least, if anybody here knows, she does. Conversely, if she doesn't know, we're all whistling in the dark.) – cfr Jul 3 '15 at 3:16
  • @cfr I appreciate it... I saw her comment, and while it's reassuring to know I could have left everything as is, I'm also curious about how I can manipulate LaTeX spacing in general, so that's why I'm spending energy on this. Working on this particular task is kind of an instructive example for me. – justin Jul 3 '15 at 3:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.