9

After reading an article by Grätzer in the current AMS-Notices on the STIX fonts, I wanted to use one of the math symbols in the article I am currently writing.

In perfect naivety I did what was suggested: I put the line \RequirePackage{stix} as the first line in the doc.

OK, you already know what happened: The article had no resemblance to its former shape anymore and had become completely unreadable.

Here my scenario: I want to use only some selected math symbols of the STIX fonts and otherwise maintain everything else as before. What it the best way to proceed?

What I want are only the delimiters \lbrbrak and \rbrbrak from STIX.

What I get and what I want

\RequirePackage{stix}
\documentclass{amsart}
%\DeclareFontEncoding{LS1}{}{}
%\DeclareFontSubstitution{LS1}{stix}{m}{n}
%\DeclareSymbolFont{largesymbols} {LS1}{stixsf}{m} {n}
%\DeclareMathDelimiter{\lbrbrak} {\mathrel}{largesymbols}{"EE}{largesymbols}{"EE}
%\DeclareMathDelimiter{\rbrbrak} {\mathrel}{largesymbols}{"EF}{largesymbols}{"EF}
\newcommand{\newbrak}[2]{\genfrac{\lbrbrak}{\rbrbrak}{0pt}{}{#1}{#2}}
\begin{document} 
    \begin{equation}
        \newbrak{k}{m}  = 
        (m n)! \, \frac{\Omega_{k}(z)}{\Omega_{m}(z)}
    \end{equation}
\end{document}

This script works. The lines beginning with 'Declare...' try to mimic the answer of David below. However out-commenting the first line and un-commenting the 'Declare..' lines leads to the error 'Insufficient extension fonts.' What did I do wrong?

6

Here's how to add the requested symbols. You don't have correctly identified the required fonts and symbols.

Look for \lbrbrak in stix.sty, to find

\stix@MathDelimiter{\lbrbrak}   {\mathopen} {largesymbols}{"EE}{largesymbols}{"14}
\stix@MathDelimiter{\rbrbrak}   {\mathclose}{largesymbols}{"EF}{largesymbols}{"15}

Thus we need to see what font largesymbols refers to:

\DeclareSymbolFont{largesymbols}  {LS2}{stixex}   {m} {n}

OK, now we need LS2:

\DeclareFontEncoding{LS2}{}{\noaccents@}
\DeclareFontSubstitution{LS2}{stix}{m}{n}

Next we have to choose a different symbolic name for the math font and put the pieces together (in reverse order).

\documentclass{amsart}

\makeatletter
\DeclareFontEncoding{LS2}{}{\@noaccents}
\makeatother
\DeclareFontSubstitution{LS2}{stix}{m}{n}

\DeclareSymbolFont{largesymbolsstix}{LS2}{stixex}{m}{n}

\DeclareMathDelimiter{\lbrbrak}{\mathopen}{largesymbolsstix}{"EE}{largesymbolsstix}{"14}
\DeclareMathDelimiter{\rbrbrak}{\mathclose}{largesymbolsstix}{"EF}{largesymbolsstix}{"15}
\newcommand{\newbrak}[2]{\genfrac{\lbrbrak}{\rbrbrak}{0pt}{}{#1}{#2}}

\begin{document}
\begin{equation}
\lbrbrak x\rbrbrak,\quad
\bigl\lbrbrak x\bigr\rbrbrak,\quad
\newbrak{k}{m}  = (m n)! \, \frac{\Omega_{k}(z)}{\Omega_{m}(z)}
\end{equation}

\end{document}

enter image description here

8

You can just look in stix.sty and extract the definition for any character:

enter image description here

\documentclass{article}

\DeclareFontEncoding{LS1}{}{}
\DeclareFontSubstitution{LS1}{stix}{m}{n}
\DeclareSymbolFont{arrows1}       {LS1}{stixsf}   {m} {n}
\DeclareMathDelimiter{\DDownarrow} {\mathrel}{arrows1}{"FF}{arrows1}{"FF}

\begin{document}\showoutput

\[\alpha + \sum x_i \DDownarrow \phi \]

\end{document}

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.