# enumerate ignores right margin in items with long words

I'm having trouble with an enumerate list and some "\item"s that contain longer words. Here LaTeX fails to do a line break and "ignores" my right margin (see \items No. 2 & 5 in my example). I could manually fix this by inserting possible manual breaks (-) in the longer words (see \item No. 3) but that can't be the proper solution, can it? Setting an [rightmargin=2.00cm] in the enumerate-environment didn't change anything about this. I don't mind having a line-break in-between words, as long as the rest of the item-text is justified

Any ideas where my mistake might be? Thank you very much, yours Sascha

\documentclass[oneside, a4paper, fontsize=12bp]{scrreprt}
\usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
\usepackage[onehalfspacing]{setspace}
\usepackage[lmargin=3.00cm,rmargin=2.00cm,tmargin=2.0cm,bmargin=3.0cm]{geometry}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{blindtext}
\usepackage{enumitem}

\begin{document}

\begin{enumerate}
\item{Wirklich langes Item: \blindtext}
\item{Welchen Einfluss hat die Kongruenz zwischen dem Interventions- und dem Prüfungsformat auf das Ergebnis einer Studie zum Butterfly-Effect?}
\item{Welchen Einfluss hat die Kongruenz zwischen dem Interventions- und dem Prüfungs"-format auf das Ergebnis einer Studie zum Butterfly-Effect?}
\item{Ein etwas längeres Item, aber ich benutze einfach mal ganz andere Wörter und gucke dann mal, was hier passiert.}
\item{Ein noch längeres Item, indem ich nun zunächstaber wirklichdeutlich längerundkompliziertere Wörter verwende}
\end{enumerate}
\end{document}


• Add \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}. Also you remove all this braces in the list. – Ulrike Fischer Jul 18 '15 at 12:27

In addition to what @UlrikeFischer has said in her comment above, delete the \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} line and make sure your packages are up-to-date. It is also recommended to use the standard settings for a KOMA Script document, twoside=false, fontsize=12pt, etc. Here is a working code:

\documentclass[twoside=false, a4paper, fontsize=12pt]{scrreprt}
\usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
\usepackage[onehalfspacing]{setspace}
\usepackage[lmargin=3.00cm,rmargin=2.00cm,tmargin=2.0cm,bmargin=3.0cm]{geometry}
\usepackage{blindtext}
\usepackage{enumitem}

\begin{document}

\begin{enumerate}
\item Wirklich langes Item: \blindtext
\item Welchen Einfluss hat die Kongruenz zwischen dem Interventions- und dem Prüfungsformat auf das Ergebnis einer Studie zum Butterfly-Effect?
\item Welchen Einfluss hat die Kongruenz zwischen dem Interventions- und dem Prüfungs"-format auf das Ergebnis einer Studie zum Butterfly-Effect?
\item Ein etwas längeres Item, aber ich benutze einfach mal ganz andere Wörter und gucke dann mal, was hier passiert.
\item Ein noch längeres Item, indem ich nun zunächstaber wirklichdeutlich längerundkompliziertere Wörter verwende
\end{enumerate}

\end{document}


• Since \item does not take an argument delimited by { and }, I would remove those symbols from the material that follows the five \item statements. – Mico Jul 19 '15 at 1:52
• It is also recommended to use the standard settings for a KOMA Script document, [twoside=false, a4paper, fontsize=12pt], etc.  Really? Since when? If they are default, they don't need to be specified, but it is news to me that KOMA is not recommended for North American users. Why would it be bad to use double-sided with KOMA (as is standard for book) or 11pt? It is recommended not to use geometry or setspace with KOMA unless you really have to - better to use KOMA's facilities if you can - but that has nothing to do with the problem the OP is concerned with in the question. – cfr Jul 19 '15 at 2:53
• @cfr KOMA is recommended for all users, I meant specifically 12bp should be 12pt and oneside should be twoside=false I just copied the whole line including a4paper. The authors can choose whatever they want, oneside, twoside, doubleside, singlespacing, doublespacing, .... nothing is incorrect. If you read the KOMA doc., you see twoside=simple switch and never oneside. See tex.stackexchange.com/questions/130430/…, and this tex.stackexchange.com/questions/96139/… – AboAmmar Jul 19 '15 at 4:03
• oneside is valid as a class option. It is not valid if passed directly to \KOMAoptions by the user. I agree about 12bp but your answer suggested to me that the options as written were all recommended which is not the case (and not what you meant). Maybe you could clarify some of this a bit? – cfr Jul 19 '15 at 9:44