9

In math, one often needs to put a letter inside the symbols <>, e.g. to denote a cyclic group <x> generated by some element x. However, plain text displays the symbols < and > as an upside down exclamation point and an upside down question mark, respectively, while math type displays a large space like so:

< x > 

Is there some way to reduce this spacing?

6

If it's important to keep the same shape of > then make sure you're using the amsmath package because it gives you three types of negative space: thin, medium and thick. Per your question, negative spacing is the method to reduce spacing. This code shows your options:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
$<x>$\\
$\langle x \rangle$   \\
$< \, x \,>$\\
$< \negmedspace x \negmedspace >$\\
$< \negthickspace x \negthickspace >$\\
\end{document} 

Personally, I like Jeff's solution or the solution with negmedspace.

  • 2
    It's usually not a good idea to mess with the spacing directly; frabjous's comment (under Jeff's answer) provides the best solution for this problem. – Rufflewind Oct 17 '13 at 19:03
  • The solutions with explicit spacings (including the one with \negmedspace) are wrong. No discussion about it. Try with $a=<\negmedspace x\negmedspace>$ and you'll clearly see why it's wrong when you compare it with $a=\langle x\rangle$: don't just look at the symbols, but also at the spacing. – egreg Sep 15 '16 at 7:25
13

I swear I searched for a long time before posting my question....but right after asking, I found the solution.

For anyone else who might want to know, the solution is to use \langle in place of < and \rangle in place of >.

  • 12
    You can also do $\left< x \right>$, or if you really want < and > then $\mathopen{<} x \mathclose{>}$. – frabjous Aug 16 '11 at 20:01
  • 1
    I would use $\langle x\rangle$ instead of $\left<x\right>$, because \left and \right sometimes create delimiters of the wrong size and may also have other unwanted effects. I think $\bigl\langle x\bigr\rangle$ and $\bigl<x\bigr>$ come out exactly the same, though. – MSC Apr 12 '14 at 20:53
0

The best solution I have is to include the following command in the beginning of the document:

\newcommand{\gen}[1]{\ensuremath{\langle #1\rangle}}

Remark: I have chosen the name of the command to be "\gen" by personal preference. This can be modified at will.

  • Welcome to TeX.SE. It would be helpful if you explained in a bit more detail how your answer differs from the one by @DJP. If nothing else, it would be helpful if you mentioned that this approach requires use of the amsmath package. – Mico Sep 15 '16 at 1:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.