3

I have recently submitted a paper on ArXiv, along with the corresponding .bbl file; while the compilation and end results are fine, it appears that the SAO/NASA ADS service cannot parse the references to point to the ones that also appear on ArXiv.

To give an example, here is one excerpt of the bbl file:

\bibitem[ADK15]{ADK:15}
Jayadev Acharya, Constantinos Daskalakis, and Gautam Kamath.
\newblock Optimal testing for properties of distributions.
\newblock {\em CoRR}, abs/1507.05952, July 2015.

which point to this paper. However, the SAO/NASA ADS website does not seem to have found this reference, as it does not include a "References in the Article" link (which would list the corresponding cited arXiv papers, as e.g. is the case here).

Is there a simple reason for this, something I did wrong in my bibtex/bbl file?* Or is it just completely arbitrary?

*The part of my bib file corresponding to the above snippet is:

@article{ADK:15,
  title = {Optimal Testing for Properties of Distributions},
  author = {Acharya, Jayadev and Daskalakis, Constantinos and Kamath, Gautam},
  journal   = {CoRR},
  eprint = {1507.05952},
  volume = {abs/1507.05952},
  primaryClass = "cs.DS",
  year = 2015,
  month = jul,
  adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015arXiv150705952A},
  adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
}
  • 3
    You may have quicker results if you simply contact ADS directly and explain the situation. With no idea how their system works (is the code open?) any suggestions would be limited to blind guesses. – Jared Kulik Aug 14 '15 at 19:25
  • Thanks -- I'll try that. I wanted to make sure it was not some known issue with my way to format citations or use a bibliography... – Clement C. Aug 15 '15 at 13:16
4

Following @Jared Kulik's comment above, I contacted ADS directly to enter the missing (arXiV) citations they couldn't find. After a few days, they added them, so that they now appear on their system.

Oddly enough, immediately after (and therefore more than 3 weeks after the posting of the paper online), Google Scholar updated its records of the other papers cited in the bibliography (that is, not only these 3) to include the citations we have. Whether it is just a coincidence (and Google Scholar is only darned slow), or this adding 3 citations in the ADS system triggered something else for Google Scholar, leading to its parsing the other entries of the bibliography, I have no clue. But everything is well now.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.